Evans C E, Haynes R B, Gilbert J R, Taylor D W, Sackett D L, Johnston M
Can Med Assoc J. 1984 Mar 15;130(6):719-22.
The usefulness of an educational package on hypertension that provides clinically important, up-to-date medical information and office "aids" to primary care physicians was tested in a randomized controlled trial. Fifty-six physicians completed a pretest multiple-choice questionnaire and were allocated at random either to a group that received the educational package (the "study group") or to a control group. There was a highly significant correlation between the pretest scores and the number of years since graduation (r = -0.55, p less than 0.0001), which indicated that younger physicians are more likely than older physicians to have an up-to-date knowledge of the management of hypertension. The increase in knowledge in the study group (17.5%) was significantly greater than that in the control group (2.7%). Furthermore, although the post-test scores in the control group were still significantly correlated with the number of years since graduation, those in the study group were not. It was concluded that although the older physicians knew less than their younger colleagues about hypertension, the use of the educational package significantly increased knowledge, and the increase was not limited by the physician's age.
一项随机对照试验对一个关于高血压的教育包的实用性进行了测试,该教育包为初级保健医生提供具有临床重要性的最新医学信息和诊室“辅助工具”。56名医生完成了一份预测试多项选择题问卷,并被随机分配到接受教育包的组(“研究组”)或对照组。预测试分数与毕业年限之间存在高度显著的相关性(r = -0.55,p小于0.0001),这表明年轻医生比年长医生更有可能掌握最新的高血压管理知识。研究组的知识增加量(17.5%)显著大于对照组(2.7%)。此外,虽然对照组的测试后分数仍与毕业年限显著相关,但研究组的分数则不然。得出的结论是,虽然年长医生比年轻同事对高血压的了解更少,但使用教育包显著增加了知识,且这种增加不受医生年龄的限制。