Suppr超能文献

三碘甲状腺原氨酸和甲状腺素测定全国质量控制调查进展报告

Progress report on a national quality-control survey of triiodothyronine and thyroxin assay.

作者信息

Zucchelli G C, Pilo A, Chiesa M R, Piro M A

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1984 Mar;30(3):395-8.

PMID:6697485
Abstract

In January 1980, a national external quality-control survey was organized to evaluate assays for triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxin (T4). Currently, about 150 laboratories are involved. Each participant has received and assayed 100 quality-control samples during four periods of about six months each. The average analytical performance achieved by the participants in each six-month period was estimated by computing the average between-laboratory agreement (CVT), the overall average bias, and the average laboratory imprecision. During the 2.5 years of the survey, analytical performance has improved for both assays (CVT decreased from 17.0 to 15.7% for T3 and from 13.1 to 12.7% for T4). Analysis of survey results according to the method/kit used (mean kit bias and kit imprecision for the nine kits most used by participants) showed that the analytical reliability of the T4 assay is generally better than that observed for T3, mainly because of the larger systematic differences among T3 kits.

摘要

1980年1月,组织了一次全国性的外部质量控制调查,以评估三碘甲状腺原氨酸(T3)和甲状腺素(T4)的检测方法。目前,约有150个实验室参与其中。每位参与者在大约每六个月的四个时间段内接收并检测了100个质量控制样本。通过计算实验室间平均一致性(CVT)、总体平均偏差和平均实验室不精密度,估算了每个六个月时间段内参与者所达到的平均分析性能。在调查的2.5年期间,两种检测方法的分析性能均有所提高(T3的CVT从17.0%降至15.7%,T4的CVT从13.1%降至12.7%)。根据所使用的方法/试剂盒(参与者最常用的九种试剂盒的平均试剂盒偏差和试剂盒不精密度)对调查结果进行分析表明,T4检测的分析可靠性总体上优于T3检测,主要是因为T3试剂盒之间存在较大的系统差异。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验