Trafford J A, Free L, Sharpstone P, Evans R
Nephron. 1984;36(3):194-6. doi: 10.1159/000183152.
Comparative studies were performed on 19 patients who were dialysed initially for a mean of 25 h a week and then for a mean of 11.1 h a week over two 3-year periods. Clinical, biochemical, haematological and neurological valuations were performed, which showed no significant difference. As an adjunct to haemodialysis a perfusion system was added to 12 of these patients already stable on haemodialysis and estimations made of removal of middle molecular weight substances from plasma by a gel filtration method through a Sephadex column. The results of these various techniques are reported and the comparisons between haemodialysis, haemodialysis and ultrafiltration and haemodialysis, perfusion and ultrafiltration are given.
对19例患者进行了对比研究，这些患者最初每周平均透析25小时，然后在两个3年期间每周平均透析11.1小时。进行了临床、生化、血液学和神经学评估，结果显示无显著差异。作为血液透析的辅助手段，在其中12例已在血液透析中病情稳定的患者中添加了灌注系统，并通过凝胶过滤法通过葡聚糖凝胶柱对血浆中中分子量物质的清除情况进行了评估。报告了这些不同技术的结果，并给出了血液透析、血液透析与超滤以及血液透析、灌注与超滤之间的比较。
