Dunn S M, Bryson J M, Hoskins P L, Alford J B, Handelsman D J, Turtle J R
Diabetes Care. 1984 Jan-Feb;7(1):36-41. doi: 10.2337/diacare.7.1.36.
The Diabetes Knowledge Assessment (DKN) scales were developed to meet a specific need for rapid and reliable knowledge assessment in diabetic patients. Item format and item selection from an initial pool of 89 items were determined by pilot-testing over 300 diabetic subjects. Reliability analysis of the resulting 40 multiple-choice items, with a further sample of 56 subjects, gave a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.92. Parallel forms DKNA, DKNB, and DKNC, each of 15 items selected from the parent set, had alpha coefficients above 0.82 and correlated 0.90 with each other. A full clinical trial, using DKNA, DKNB, and DKNC in randomized order of presentation, was conducted with 219 subjects attending a 2-day diabetes education program. Overall DKN scores improved from 7.6 (51%) to 11.3 (75%). Analysis of variance confirmed that DKNA, DKNB, and DKNC were equivalent forms at pretest. Mean posttest scores on DKNB were lower than the other scales (P less than 0.001), but variances were equivalent for all three. A specific local change in the education program format was found to account for this discrepancy in the DKNB posttest mean. In situations where comprehensive assessment of diabetes knowledge would be time-consuming and unnecessary, these results indicate that rapid and reliable assessment is possible with a scale of only 15 validated items. The development of parallel forms of the scale extends the range of retesting possibilities for diagnosis and research.
糖尿病知识评估(DKN)量表的开发是为了满足对糖尿病患者进行快速可靠的知识评估的特定需求。通过对300多名糖尿病患者进行预测试,确定了最初89个条目中的条目格式和条目选择。对由此产生的40个多项选择题进行可靠性分析,以另外56名受试者为样本,得出的克朗巴赫α系数为0.92。从母集中选出的平行形式DKNA、DKNB和DKNC,各有15个条目,其α系数均高于0.82,且相互之间的相关性为0.90。对参加为期两天糖尿病教育项目的219名受试者进行了一项全面的临床试验,以随机呈现的顺序使用DKNA、DKNB和DKNC。DKN的总体得分从7.6(51%)提高到了11.3(75%)。方差分析证实,DKNA、DKNB和DKNC在预测试时是等效形式。DKNB的测试后平均得分低于其他量表(P<0.001),但所有三个量表的方差是等效的。发现教育项目形式的一个特定局部变化可以解释DKNB测试后平均值的这种差异。在对糖尿病知识进行全面评估既耗时又不必要的情况下,这些结果表明,使用仅15个经过验证的条目的量表就可以进行快速可靠的评估。该量表平行形式的开发扩展了用于诊断和研究的重新测试可能性的范围。