Suppr超能文献

[胃镜下息肉切除术是诊断必需的吗?一项前瞻性研究的结果]

[Is gastroscopic polypectomy a diagnostic necessity? Results of a prospective study].

作者信息

Ottenjann R, Kunert H, Seib H J

出版信息

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1984 Mar 23;109(12):443-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1069210.

Abstract

In a prospective study 76 gastric polyps (of 67 patients) were investigated consecutively by forceps biopsy and by endoscopic polypectomy. The results were compared histologically. Differences arose only in the group where focal foveolar hyperplasia had been diagnosed by forceps biopsy. Of these, 33 remained with the same diagnosis on microscopic assessment of the whole polyp, 14 were hyperplasiogenic polyps, 7 fibrous-inflammatory polyps and in one case there were cysts of the glandular body. A clinically relevant difference was observed in only one polyp where biopsy in toto showed a borderline lesion whereas forceps biopsy had only shown focal foveolar hyperplasia. Critical reevaluation of the specimens led to reassignment as focal foveolar hyperplasia and intestinal metaplasia. There were no differences of histology in the group of adenocarcinoma, adenomas and borderline lesions. Thus, endoscopic forceps biopsy of gastric polyps suffices to reliably differentiate benign from malignant polyps including those which are considered precancerous.

摘要

在一项前瞻性研究中,对67例患者的76个胃息肉连续进行了钳取活检和内镜下息肉切除术,并对结果进行了组织学比较。仅在钳取活检诊断为局灶性胃小凹增生的组中出现了差异。其中,33个息肉在对整个息肉进行显微镜评估时诊断相同,14个为增生性息肉,7个为纤维炎性息肉,1例为腺囊肿。仅在1个息肉中观察到临床相关差异,整块活检显示为交界性病变,而钳取活检仅显示局灶性胃小凹增生。对标本进行严格重新评估后重新诊断为局灶性胃小凹增生和肠化生。腺癌、腺瘤和交界性病变组的组织学无差异。因此,胃息肉的内镜钳取活检足以可靠地区分良性息肉与恶性息肉,包括那些被认为是癌前病变的息肉。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验