Zihl J, Werth R
Neuropsychologia. 1984;22(1):13-22. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(84)90003-4.
This study investigated the effect of practice on saccadic localization in the perimetrically blind field region by patients with postgeniculate brain damage. The analysis of the saccadic responses of three patients with homonymous visual field defects showed that in the first test sessions they did not choose between different locations but, rather, preferred a consistent magnitude of eye movements. In these sessions no correspondence between target and mean eye position was found. After the patients were forced to change final eye position in each trial, a significant localization performance was observed. It seems, therefore, that the choice between different locations is a necessary, but obviously not a sufficient, prerequisite for the ability to locate targets within the perimetrically blind hemifield. Forcing the patient to frequently choose between different locations within his perimetrically blind hemifield may help him to use his spared localization ability even though he can never see the target.
本研究调查了膝状体后脑部损伤患者的练习对视野周边盲区内扫视定位的影响。对三名患有同侧视野缺损患者的扫视反应分析表明,在首次测试阶段,他们并未在不同位置之间进行选择,而是更倾向于一致幅度的眼球运动。在这些测试阶段,未发现目标与平均眼球位置之间存在对应关系。在患者被迫在每次试验中改变最终眼球位置后,观察到了显著的定位表现。因此,似乎在不同位置之间进行选择是在视野周边盲半区内定位目标能力的必要条件,但显然不是充分条件。迫使患者在其视野周边盲半区内的不同位置之间频繁进行选择,可能有助于他利用其保留的定位能力,即使他永远无法看到目标。