Wilson P A, Skatrud J B, Dempsey J A
Respir Physiol. 1984 Jan;55(1):103-20. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(84)90120-8.
We determined the effects of slow wave sleep on ventilatory compensation to inspiratory elastic loads (18 cm H2O/L). Multiple loading trials of variable duration were applied in three healthy adult humans in wakefulness and during NREM sleep. During wakefulness, ventilatory response over 5 loaded breaths were highly variable. Tidal volume (VT), mean inspiratory flow (VT/TI), and minute ventilation (VE) were preserved or increased in 2 of the 3 subjects in whom mouth occlusion pressure (P0.1) was augmented in the immediate (second breath) response to the load. In the third subject who showed no change in P0.1, VE was not preserved during loading. During NREM sleep, the loading response was highly consistent in all trials and in all 3 subjects. P0.1 on the second loaded breath was not increased; thus VE, VT and VT/TI were reduced over five loaded breaths. This absence of immediate load compensation during NREM sleep was similar during normoxia, hyperoxia, and hypercapnia. During sustained loading in NREM sleep VE and VT returned toward control levels coincident with an increase in end tidal CO2. We conclude that augmentation of inspiratory neural drive sufficient for immediate compensation to elastic loads requires wakefulness. Compensatory responses to loading do not occur during NREM sleep until inspiratory effort is augmented by chemical stimuli.
我们确定了慢波睡眠对吸气弹性负荷(18厘米水柱/升)通气补偿的影响。对三名健康成年人在清醒状态和非快速眼动睡眠期间进行了多次不同时长的负荷试验。在清醒状态下,5次负荷呼吸期间的通气反应高度可变。在3名受试者中,有2名受试者在对负荷的即刻(第二次呼吸)反应中口腔闭合压(P0.1)增加,其潮气量(VT)、平均吸气流量(VT/TI)和分钟通气量(VE)得以维持或增加。在P0.1无变化的第三名受试者中,负荷期间VE未得到维持。在非快速眼动睡眠期间,所有试验和所有3名受试者的负荷反应高度一致。第二次负荷呼吸时的P0.1未增加;因此,在5次负荷呼吸期间,VE、VT和VT/TI均降低。在常氧、高氧和高碳酸血症期间,非快速眼动睡眠期间这种缺乏即刻负荷补偿的情况相似。在非快速眼动睡眠期间持续负荷时,VE和VT恢复至对照水平,同时呼气末二氧化碳增加。我们得出结论,足以对弹性负荷进行即刻补偿的吸气神经驱动增强需要清醒状态。在非快速眼动睡眠期间,直到化学刺激增强吸气努力,才会出现对负荷的代偿反应。