Buddle B M, Dellers R W, Schurig G G
Am J Vet Res. 1984 Feb;45(2):263-6.
Cross-protection experiments were undertaken to investigate reasons for contagious ecthyma (CE) virus-vaccination failures. Vaccination with sheep-passaged or with cell culture-passaged virus did not protect lambs against development of lesions after challenge inoculation with sheep-passaged virus. However, lesions which developed after challenge exposure with sheep-passaged CE virus healed significantly faster than did those induced by the initial vaccination with sheep-passaged virus (P less than 0.001). A significant decrease in the healing time was not observed for lambs initially vaccinated with cell culture-passaged CE virus after challenge exposure with sheep-passaged virus (P greater than 0.05). Protection was evident when lambs were challenge inoculated with the less virulent cell culture-passaged virus and cross-protection between the ST and CSL isolates was detected. This study indicated that complete protection even against homologous strain challenge was not achieved. Antigenic differences between vaccinal and field strains appeared an unlikely cause of vaccination failures. It also is evident that cell culture-propagated CE virus preparations are less effective for vaccination purposes than are those propagated in sheep.
进行交叉保护实验以调查传染性脓疱病(CE)病毒疫苗接种失败的原因。用羊传代病毒或细胞培养传代病毒进行疫苗接种,在接种羊传代病毒进行攻毒后,不能保护羔羊不发生病变。然而,用羊传代CE病毒攻毒后出现的病变愈合速度明显快于最初用羊传代病毒接种所诱导的病变(P小于0.001)。在用羊传代病毒攻毒后,最初用细胞培养传代CE病毒接种的羔羊未观察到愈合时间显著缩短(P大于0.05)。当用毒性较小的细胞培养传代病毒对羔羊进行攻毒接种并检测到ST和CSL分离株之间的交叉保护时,保护作用明显。该研究表明,即使针对同源毒株攻毒也未实现完全保护。疫苗株和野毒株之间的抗原差异似乎不太可能是疫苗接种失败的原因。同样明显的是,细胞培养繁殖的CE病毒制剂用于疫苗接种的效果不如在羊体内繁殖的制剂。