Dunbar L L, Adkins R B, Waterhouse G
Am Surg. 1984 Apr;50(4):198-204.
The management of penetrating neck trauma remains a controversial subject. Two distinct approaches have been advocated: "mandatory" versus "selective" exploration of all neck wounds. Surgical intervention in our institution is based upon the latter, a selective principle of individualization of the patient and his injury. Obvious early exploration is indicated for patients with evidence of major vascular injury, visceral injury, or with progressive neurologic deficit. In the absence of such signs of injury, the authors used a diagnostic protocol which includes esophagram and arteriography. This retrospective reviews and assesses the results of this selectively conservative policy.
颈部穿透伤的处理仍然是一个有争议的话题。有两种截然不同的方法被提倡:对所有颈部伤口进行“强制性”与“选择性”探查。我们机构的手术干预基于后者,即根据患者及其损伤情况进行个体化的选择性原则。对于有主要血管损伤、内脏损伤证据或有进行性神经功能缺损的患者,需进行明显的早期探查。在没有此类损伤迹象的情况下,作者采用了一种诊断方案,包括食管造影和动脉造影。本回顾性研究回顾并评估了这种选择性保守策略的结果。