Suppr超能文献

医学中的“无损失”理念。

The 'no lose' philosophy in medicine.

作者信息

Galbraith S

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1978 Jun;4(2):61-3. doi: 10.1136/jme.4.2.61.

Abstract

This article as the series title suggests focuses our attention on decisions, both medical and ethical, which face doctors and related personnel in the medical profession daily. Many of these decisions take the form of a choice to one thing or another without being very sure of the outcome of either action. Mr Galbraith explores the pros and cons of what he calls the 'no lose' philosophy in medicine and which plays a large part in medical decision making. He concludes that possibly we may need a new philosophy rather than continuing to use more and more of our resources on care, which is perhaps being carried out as a means of avoiding making value judgements and thus possibly, prevents us from solving some of today's difficult ethical problems.

摘要

正如系列标题所示,本文将我们的注意力集中在医学专业的医生及相关人员每天面临的医疗和伦理决策上。其中许多决策采取了在不太确定任何一种行动结果的情况下对某件事或另一件事进行选择的形式。加尔布雷斯先生探讨了他所谓的医学中的“无损失”理念的利弊,这种理念在医疗决策中起着很大的作用。他得出结论,或许我们可能需要一种新的理念,而不是继续将越来越多的资源用于护理,因为护理可能是作为一种避免做出价值判断的手段而进行的,从而可能使我们无法解决当今一些棘手的伦理问题。

相似文献

1
The 'no lose' philosophy in medicine.医学中的“无损失”理念。
J Med Ethics. 1978 Jun;4(2):61-3. doi: 10.1136/jme.4.2.61.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
Choosing priorities.确定优先事项。
J Med Ethics. 1979 Jun;5(2):73-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.5.2.73.
6
Paternalism and medical ethics.家长主义与医学伦理学。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jun 29;290(6486):1971-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6486.1971.
8
Medical ethics: some reservations.医学伦理学:一些保留意见。
J Med Ethics. 1982 Sep;8(3):117-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.8.3.117.
10
Ethics and medicine.伦理与医学。
Linacre Q. 1973 Aug;40(3):182-200.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验