Robbins J, Fisher H B, Blom E C, Singer M I
J Speech Hear Disord. 1984 May;49(2):202-10. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4902.202.
Acoustic characteristics of two types of alaryngeal speech were quantified and compared to normal speech production. High-quality audio recordings were obtained from 15 subjects who had undergone the tracheoesophageal puncture method of postlaryngectomy vocal rehabilitation (Singer & Blom, 1980), 15 esophageal speakers, and 15 laryngeal talkers as they sustained the vowel /alpha/ and read a standard paragraph. Ten frequency, 7 intensity, and 13 duration variables were quantified. Central tendency and variability measures of frequency and duration for the three speaker groups indicated that tracheoesophageal speech is more similar to normal speech than is esophageal speech. Intensity measures indicated that tracheoesophageal speech is more intense than normal and esophageal speech.
对两种无喉语音的声学特征进行了量化，并与正常语音产生进行了比较。从15名接受了喉切除术后气管食管穿刺法嗓音康复的受试者（Singer & Blom，1980）、15名食管发音者和15名喉部发声者那里获取了高质量的音频记录，记录内容为他们发元音/α/以及朗读一段标准段落时的情况。对10个频率、7个强度和13个时长变量进行了量化。三个发音者组频率和时长的集中趋势及变异性测量结果表明，气管食管语音比食管语音更接近正常语音。强度测量结果表明，气管食管语音比正常语音和食管语音更响亮。
