Baron E J, Bruckner D A
Rev Infect Dis. 1984 Mar-Apr;6 Suppl 1:S249-53. doi: 10.1093/clinids/6.supplement_1.s249.
The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 110 anaerobic bacteria (84% fresh clinical isolates) to nine antimicrobial agents were determined simultaneously by the tentative reference agar-dilution method of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards and a prototype commercial microbroth panel (Microscan). MICs (determined visually for either system) differed by greater than 1 log2 dilution in 17% of all tests. With the exceptions of the MICs of tetracycline and moxalactam, however, all compared antimicrobial MICs were within 1 log2 dilution for at least 82% of all tests. Twenty-three anaerobic bacterial strains (21%) failed to grow in the microdilution panel (Wilkins-Chalgren broth), and seven strains (6%) failed to grow on the reference Wilkins-Chalgren agar. However, for those bacterial strains that could be tested, the microbroth panel appeared to be less cumbersome than the agar-dilution procedure for susceptibility testing of anaerobic microorganisms.
采用美国国家临床实验室标准委员会的暂行参考琼脂稀释法和一种商业微型肉汤板(Microscan)原型,同时测定了110株厌氧菌(84%为新鲜临床分离株)对9种抗菌药物的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。在所有测试中,17%的测试中两种系统(通过肉眼判断)测定的MIC相差超过1个log2稀释度。然而,除四环素和莫拉卡坦的MIC外,所有比较的抗菌药物MIC在至少82%的测试中相差在1个log2稀释度以内。23株厌氧菌(21%)在微量稀释板(威尔金斯-查尔格伦肉汤)中未能生长,7株(6%)在参考威尔金斯-查尔格伦琼脂上未能生长。然而,对于那些能够进行测试的菌株,微型肉汤板在厌氧菌药敏试验中似乎比琼脂稀释法更简便。