Rosenblatt J E, Murray P R, Sonnenwirth A C, Joyce J L
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Mar;15(3):351-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.15.3.351.
Susceptibility tests using 7 antimicrobial agents (carbenicillin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, penicillin, cephalothin, metronidazole, and tetracycline) were run against 35 anaerobes including Bacteroides fragilis (17), other gram-negative bacilli (7), clostridia (5), peptococci (4), and eubacteria (2). Results in triplicate obtained by the microbroth dilution method and the aerobic modification of the broth disk method were compared with those obtained with an agar dilution method using Wilkins-Chalgren agar. Media used in the microbroth dilution method included Wilkins-Chalgren broth, brain heart infusion broth, brucella broth, tryptic soy broth, thioglycolate broth, and Schaedler's broth. A result differing by more than one dilution from the Wilkins-Chalgren agar result was considered a discrepancy, and when there was a change in susceptibility status this was termed a significant discrepancy. The microbroth dilution method using Wilkins-Chalgren broth and thioglycolate broth produced the fewest total discrepancies (22 and 24, respectively), and Wilkins-Chalgren broth, thioglycolate, and Schaedler's broth had the fewest significant discrepancies (6, 5, and 5, respectively). With the broth disk method, there were 15 significant discrepancies, although half of these were with tetracycline, which was the antimicrobial agent associated with the highest number of significant discrepancies (33), considering all of the test methods and media.
使用7种抗菌剂(羧苄青霉素、氯霉素、克林霉素、青霉素、头孢噻吩、甲硝唑和四环素)对35株厌氧菌进行药敏试验,这些厌氧菌包括脆弱拟杆菌(17株)、其他革兰氏阴性杆菌(7株)、梭菌(5株)、消化球菌(4株)和真细菌(2株)。通过微量肉汤稀释法和肉汤纸片法的需氧改良法一式三份获得的结果,与使用威尔金斯-查尔格伦琼脂的琼脂稀释法获得的结果进行比较。微量肉汤稀释法中使用的培养基包括威尔金斯-查尔格伦肉汤、脑心浸液肉汤、布鲁氏菌肉汤、胰蛋白胨大豆肉汤、硫乙醇酸盐肉汤和谢德勒肉汤。与威尔金斯-查尔格伦琼脂结果相差超过一个稀释度的结果被视为差异,当药敏状态发生变化时,这被称为显著差异。使用威尔金斯-查尔格伦肉汤和硫乙醇酸盐肉汤的微量肉汤稀释法产生的总差异最少(分别为22和24),威尔金斯-查尔格伦肉汤、硫乙醇酸盐肉汤和谢德勒肉汤的显著差异最少(分别为6、5和5)。对于肉汤纸片法,有15个显著差异,尽管其中一半与四环素有关,考虑到所有测试方法和培养基,四环素是与显著差异数量最多(33)相关的抗菌剂。