Suppr超能文献

不同方法获得的厌氧药敏结果比较。

Comparison of anaerobic susceptibility results obtained by different methods.

作者信息

Rosenblatt J E, Murray P R, Sonnenwirth A C, Joyce J L

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Mar;15(3):351-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.15.3.351.

Abstract

Susceptibility tests using 7 antimicrobial agents (carbenicillin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, penicillin, cephalothin, metronidazole, and tetracycline) were run against 35 anaerobes including Bacteroides fragilis (17), other gram-negative bacilli (7), clostridia (5), peptococci (4), and eubacteria (2). Results in triplicate obtained by the microbroth dilution method and the aerobic modification of the broth disk method were compared with those obtained with an agar dilution method using Wilkins-Chalgren agar. Media used in the microbroth dilution method included Wilkins-Chalgren broth, brain heart infusion broth, brucella broth, tryptic soy broth, thioglycolate broth, and Schaedler's broth. A result differing by more than one dilution from the Wilkins-Chalgren agar result was considered a discrepancy, and when there was a change in susceptibility status this was termed a significant discrepancy. The microbroth dilution method using Wilkins-Chalgren broth and thioglycolate broth produced the fewest total discrepancies (22 and 24, respectively), and Wilkins-Chalgren broth, thioglycolate, and Schaedler's broth had the fewest significant discrepancies (6, 5, and 5, respectively). With the broth disk method, there were 15 significant discrepancies, although half of these were with tetracycline, which was the antimicrobial agent associated with the highest number of significant discrepancies (33), considering all of the test methods and media.

摘要

使用7种抗菌剂(羧苄青霉素、氯霉素、克林霉素、青霉素、头孢噻吩、甲硝唑和四环素)对35株厌氧菌进行药敏试验,这些厌氧菌包括脆弱拟杆菌(17株)、其他革兰氏阴性杆菌(7株)、梭菌(5株)、消化球菌(4株)和真细菌(2株)。通过微量肉汤稀释法和肉汤纸片法的需氧改良法一式三份获得的结果,与使用威尔金斯-查尔格伦琼脂的琼脂稀释法获得的结果进行比较。微量肉汤稀释法中使用的培养基包括威尔金斯-查尔格伦肉汤、脑心浸液肉汤、布鲁氏菌肉汤、胰蛋白胨大豆肉汤、硫乙醇酸盐肉汤和谢德勒肉汤。与威尔金斯-查尔格伦琼脂结果相差超过一个稀释度的结果被视为差异,当药敏状态发生变化时,这被称为显著差异。使用威尔金斯-查尔格伦肉汤和硫乙醇酸盐肉汤的微量肉汤稀释法产生的总差异最少(分别为22和24),威尔金斯-查尔格伦肉汤、硫乙醇酸盐肉汤和谢德勒肉汤的显著差异最少(分别为6、5和5)。对于肉汤纸片法,有15个显著差异,尽管其中一半与四环素有关,考虑到所有测试方法和培养基,四环素是与显著差异数量最多(33)相关的抗菌剂。

相似文献

1
Comparison of anaerobic susceptibility results obtained by different methods.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Mar;15(3):351-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.15.3.351.
2
Aerobically incubated thioglycolate broth disk method for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobes.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Oct;10(4):727-32. doi: 10.1128/AAC.10.4.727.
3
Practical anaerobic broth-disk elution susceptibility test.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Apr;17(4):740-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.17.4.740.
4
Comparison of susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria determined by agar dilution and by a microbroth method.
Rev Infect Dis. 1984 Mar-Apr;6 Suppl 1:S249-53. doi: 10.1093/clinids/6.supplement_1.s249.
5
Collaborative evaluation of a proposed reference dilution method of susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Oct;16(4):495-502. doi: 10.1128/AAC.16.4.495.
6
Evaluation of the modified broth-disk method for determining antibiotic susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Jun;7(6):721-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.7.6.721.
7
Susceptibility testing of clinically isolated anaerobic bacteria by an agar dilution technique.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Apr;17(4):629-35. doi: 10.1128/AAC.17.4.629.
9
Micro-Media Systems anaerobe panel versus broth disk method in anaerobe antimicrobial testing.
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jun;17(6):949-52. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.6.949-952.1983.
10
Evaluation of two broth disk methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobes.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Oct;26(4):601-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.26.4.601.

引用本文的文献

1
Altered Gut Microbiome under Antiretroviral Therapy: Impact of Efavirenz and Zidovudine.
ACS Infect Dis. 2021 May 14;7(5):1104-1115. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00536. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
2
Biographical Feature: Alexander C. Sonnenwirth, Ph.D.
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 May;54(5):1183-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00263-16. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
3
[Pitfalls in determining resistance].
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2014 Apr;109(3):182-6. doi: 10.1007/s00063-013-0311-6. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
4
Practical anaerobic broth-disk elution susceptibility test.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Apr;17(4):740-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.17.4.740.
5
Effect of incubation conditions on anaerobic susceptibility testing results.
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Dec;16(6):1152-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.6.1152-1154.1982.
7
Susceptibility testing of clinically isolated anaerobic bacteria by an agar dilution technique.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Apr;17(4):629-35. doi: 10.1128/AAC.17.4.629.
8
Micro-Media Systems anaerobe panel versus broth disk method in anaerobe antimicrobial testing.
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jun;17(6):949-52. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.6.949-952.1983.
9
Preparing inoculum for susceptibility testing of anaerobes.
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Mar;19(3):321-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.3.321-325.1984.
10
Modified broth-disk surveillance of clindamycin-resistant Bacteroides fragilis group.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Jun;23(6):947-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.23.6.947.

本文引用的文献

1
Modified broth-disk method for testing the antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Mar;3(3):350-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.3.3.350.
2
Microdilution technique for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Mar;7(3):311-15. doi: 10.1128/AAC.7.3.311.
3
Medium for use in antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Dec;10(6):926-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.10.6.926.
4
Aerobically incubated thioglycolate broth disk method for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobes.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Oct;10(4):727-32. doi: 10.1128/AAC.10.4.727.
5
Stability of antimicrobials in Schaedler's anaerobic and brain heart infusion broths stored at --20 degrees C.
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1978 Mar;31(3):226-8. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.31.226.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验