Enslev L, Andersen B N, Fahrenkrug J, Magid E, Thorsgaard-Pedersen N
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1984 Mar;19(2):204-8.
The efficiency of immunoreactive trypsin (IRT), pancreatic polypeptide (PP), and pancreatic isoamylase (PI) in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis was studied in 80 consecutive patients clinically suspected of having chronic pancreatitis. Twenty-five patients had chronic pancreatitis, and of these, 17 had pancreatic insufficiency. IRT, PP, and PI were of no value in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis without insufficiency. The three tests were of equal but limited value in diagnosing pancreatic insufficiency (nosographic sensitivities, 0.53 to 0.59, and predictive values of a negative test, 0.88 to 0.90). The combination of IRT, PP, and PI did not increase the diagnostic efficiency compared with each of the three tests alone. We conclude that IRT, PP, and PI are of similar but limited value as diagnostic tests for pancreatic insufficiency.
在80例临床疑似慢性胰腺炎的连续患者中,研究了免疫反应性胰蛋白酶(IRT)、胰多肽(PP)和胰异淀粉酶(PI)在慢性胰腺炎诊断中的效率。25例患者患有慢性胰腺炎,其中17例存在胰腺功能不全。IRT、PP和PI对无功能不全的慢性胰腺炎诊断无价值。这三项检测在诊断胰腺功能不全方面具有同等但有限的价值(疾病分类敏感性为0.53至0.59,阴性检测预测值为0.88至0.90)。与单独的三项检测相比,IRT、PP和PI联合使用并未提高诊断效率。我们得出结论,IRT、PP和PI作为胰腺功能不全的诊断检测具有相似但有限的价值。