Morris R, Bakker D, Satz P, Van der Vlugt H
Brain Lang. 1984 May;22(1):49-66. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(84)90079-8.
Dichotic listening research with children has continued to be prevalent although numerous authors have described both theoretical and methodological limitations with traditional dichotic listening free-recall paradigms. The present research adds to this growing skepticism by reanalyzing two major longitudinal studies of children's ear asymmetries. These two studies, based in different countries (United States, Holland), utilized highly similar paradigms (free-recall digits), subjects (males), and age levels (kindergarten and second and fifth grade). The questions of ear advantage development, patterns of ear advantages, and the relationship between dichotic listening performance and reading skills are addressed from the multiple statistical methodologies represented in the literature. From these analyses, support for all of the major hypotheses regarding the developmental patterns of dichotic listening performances could be obtained from the same data samples. The use of traditional free-recall dichotic listening paradigms are not recommended for use with children. The implications for future research are discussed.
尽管众多作者都描述了传统双耳分听自由回忆范式在理论和方法上的局限性,但针对儿童的双耳分听研究仍然很普遍。本研究通过重新分析两项关于儿童耳不对称性的主要纵向研究,加剧了这种日益增长的怀疑态度。这两项研究分别来自不同国家(美国、荷兰),采用了高度相似的范式(自由回忆数字)、受试者(男性)和年龄水平(幼儿园、二年级和五年级)。文献中所代表的多种统计方法探讨了耳优势发展、耳优势模式以及双耳分听表现与阅读技能之间的关系问题。从这些分析中,可以从相同的数据样本中获得对所有关于双耳分听表现发展模式的主要假设的支持。不建议将传统的自由回忆双耳分听范式用于儿童。文中还讨论了对未来研究的启示。