Culp C E, Carlson H C
Gastrointest Radiol. 1984;9(1):69-72. doi: 10.1007/BF01887805.
In an attempt to define the optimal interval of safety when a barium enema study of the colon follows a planned injury of the bowel by local treatment or biopsy (or both), we studied a group of 833 patients who were seen at the Mayo Clinic during 1978. In the study group, 886 polyps were destroyed by fulguration, 258 lesions were both sampled and fulgurated, and 126 areas were sampled for biopsy study. One hundred ninety-four patients had multiple lesions; in 193 of these, 2-18 diminutive polyps were fulgurated. Of the 846 barium studies in the 833 patients, 5 were done on the same day as the planned injury, 543 within 24 hours, and 174 within 72 hours. Four patients demonstrated extravasation of barium, but none had signs or symptoms of acute perforation nor did the resected surgical specimen demonstrate communication with site of injury.
为了确定在结肠钡灌肠检查之前通过局部治疗或活检(或两者皆有)对肠道进行计划性损伤后安全的最佳间隔时间,我们研究了1978年在梅奥诊所就诊的833例患者。在研究组中,886颗息肉通过电灼法破坏,258处病变既进行了采样又进行了电灼,126处区域进行了活检采样。194例患者有多处病变;其中193例,2 - 18颗微小息肉被电灼。在833例患者的846次钡剂检查中,5次与计划性损伤在同一天进行,543次在24小时内进行,174次在72小时内进行。4例患者出现钡剂外渗,但均无急性穿孔的体征或症状,切除的手术标本也未显示与损伤部位相通。