Suppr超能文献

诊断性侵入性检查与结肠直肠钡剂灌肠检查之间是否存在安全间隔期?

Is there a safe interval between diagnostic invasive procedure and the barium enema study of the colorectum?

作者信息

Culp C E, Carlson H C

出版信息

Gastrointest Radiol. 1984;9(1):69-72. doi: 10.1007/BF01887805.

Abstract

In an attempt to define the optimal interval of safety when a barium enema study of the colon follows a planned injury of the bowel by local treatment or biopsy (or both), we studied a group of 833 patients who were seen at the Mayo Clinic during 1978. In the study group, 886 polyps were destroyed by fulguration, 258 lesions were both sampled and fulgurated, and 126 areas were sampled for biopsy study. One hundred ninety-four patients had multiple lesions; in 193 of these, 2-18 diminutive polyps were fulgurated. Of the 846 barium studies in the 833 patients, 5 were done on the same day as the planned injury, 543 within 24 hours, and 174 within 72 hours. Four patients demonstrated extravasation of barium, but none had signs or symptoms of acute perforation nor did the resected surgical specimen demonstrate communication with site of injury.

摘要

为了确定在结肠钡灌肠检查之前通过局部治疗或活检(或两者皆有)对肠道进行计划性损伤后安全的最佳间隔时间,我们研究了1978年在梅奥诊所就诊的833例患者。在研究组中,886颗息肉通过电灼法破坏,258处病变既进行了采样又进行了电灼,126处区域进行了活检采样。194例患者有多处病变;其中193例,2 - 18颗微小息肉被电灼。在833例患者的846次钡剂检查中,5次与计划性损伤在同一天进行,543次在24小时内进行,174次在72小时内进行。4例患者出现钡剂外渗,但均无急性穿孔的体征或症状,切除的手术标本也未显示与损伤部位相通。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验