• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Intercomparison of seven radioimmunoassay kits and a fluorescence polarization immunoassay kit for digoxin.

作者信息

Erickson K A, Green P J

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1984 Jul;30(7):1225-7.

PMID:6733904
Abstract

Samples from 33 patients being treated with digoxin and three concentrations of control material were analyzed for this drug by use of seven radioimmunoassay (RIA) kits and an automated fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) system. CVs ranged from 2.4 to 6.4% for the FPIA system and from 4.6 to 7.4% for two RIA methods. In the analysis of between-method variability of RIA kits, CVs ranged from 6.1 to 33.2%. We compared each RIA kit with the other six RIA kits (I), as well as each RIA kit with the FPIA system (II). Correlation coefficients were greater than or equal to 0.96 in all cases. Slopes ranged from 0.82 to 1.20 for comparison I and from 0.86 to 1.01 for comparison II. For the FPIA system, analytical recovery of digoxin ranged from 94 to 104%. For the RIA methods we examined, analytical recoveries ranged from 113 to 135%. Analysis time is shorter and precision is greater for the FPIA system than for the RIA methods.

摘要

相似文献

1
Intercomparison of seven radioimmunoassay kits and a fluorescence polarization immunoassay kit for digoxin.
Clin Chem. 1984 Jul;30(7):1225-7.
2
Evaluation of the fluorescence polarization immunoassay for quantitation of digoxin in serum.用于血清中地高辛定量的荧光偏振免疫测定法的评估。
Ther Drug Monit. 1984;6(4):454-7. doi: 10.1097/00007691-198412000-00013.
3
Predictive performance study of two digoxin assays in subjects with various degrees of renal function.两种地高辛检测方法在不同肾功能程度受试者中的预测性能研究。
Ther Drug Monit. 2000 Dec;22(6):729-36. doi: 10.1097/00007691-200012000-00013.
4
False-positive serum digoxin concentrations determined by three digoxin assays in patients with liver disease.肝病患者中通过三种地高辛测定法测得的血清地高辛浓度假阳性结果
Clin Pharm. 1988 Jun;7(6):444-9.
5
Digoxin-like immunoreactive substance: monoclonal and polyclonal RIA and FPIA compared.洋地黄样免疫反应性物质:单克隆和多克隆放射免疫分析及荧光偏振免疫分析的比较
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1989;7(5):585-92. doi: 10.1016/0731-7085(89)80224-9.
6
Clinical evaluation of the Abbott TDx fluorescence polarization immunoassay analyzer.雅培TDx荧光偏振免疫分析分析仪的临床评估。
Ther Drug Monit. 1984;6(3):360-7. doi: 10.1097/00007691-198409000-00018.
7
Measuring endogenous digoxin-like substance and exogenous digoxin in the serum of low-birth-weight infants.测量低体重儿血清中的内源性洋地黄样物质和外源性地高辛。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985 Sep;42(9):1977-9.
8
Interference of digoxin-like immunoreactive substances with three digoxin immunoassays in patients with various degrees of renal function.
Clin Pharm. 1986 Oct;5(10):810-6.
9
Effect of protein concentration on the determination of digoxin in serum by fluorescence polarization immunoassay.蛋白质浓度对荧光偏振免疫分析法测定血清中地高辛的影响。
Clin Chem. 1984 Nov;30(11):1826-9.
10
[False results of measuring digoxin levels in patients with renal failure. Comparison of the RIA--FPIA methods].[肾衰竭患者地高辛水平测量的假结果。放射免疫分析法与荧光偏振免疫分析法的比较]
Kardiol Pol. 1990 Feb;33(2):116-21.