Suppr超能文献

东莨菪碱透皮贴剂、口服茶苯海明与安慰剂治疗晕动病的效果比较

Transdermal scopolamine, oral meclizine, and placebo in motion sickness.

作者信息

Dahl E, Offer-Ohlsen D, Lillevold P E, Sandvik L

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1984 Jul;36(1):116-20. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1984.148.

Abstract

The efficacy of transdermal scopolamine, oral meclizine, and placebo in protection against motion sickness was compared in a double-blind crossover study. Thirty-six healthy subjects were exposed to motion three times for 90 min in a ship-motion simulator. Transdermal applications were made and tablets were taken at least 12 and 2 hr before exposure to motion. Transdermal scopolamine provided better protection than placebo or meclizine. Dryness of mouth was the only side effect reported more frequently for one regimen, transdermal scopolamine.

摘要

在一项双盲交叉研究中,比较了透皮给药东莨菪碱、口服茶苯海明和安慰剂预防晕动病的效果。36名健康受试者在船舶运动模拟器中接受3次90分钟的运动刺激。在运动刺激前至少12小时和2小时进行透皮给药并服用片剂。透皮给药的东莨菪碱比安慰剂或茶苯海明提供了更好的保护。口干是唯一一种在一种给药方案(透皮给药东莨菪碱)中报告更频繁的副作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验