Dahl E, Offer-Ohlsen D, Lillevold P E, Sandvik L
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1984 Jul;36(1):116-20. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1984.148.
The efficacy of transdermal scopolamine, oral meclizine, and placebo in protection against motion sickness was compared in a double-blind crossover study. Thirty-six healthy subjects were exposed to motion three times for 90 min in a ship-motion simulator. Transdermal applications were made and tablets were taken at least 12 and 2 hr before exposure to motion. Transdermal scopolamine provided better protection than placebo or meclizine. Dryness of mouth was the only side effect reported more frequently for one regimen, transdermal scopolamine.
在一项双盲交叉研究中,比较了透皮给药东莨菪碱、口服茶苯海明和安慰剂预防晕动病的效果。36名健康受试者在船舶运动模拟器中接受3次90分钟的运动刺激。在运动刺激前至少12小时和2小时进行透皮给药并服用片剂。透皮给药的东莨菪碱比安慰剂或茶苯海明提供了更好的保护。口干是唯一一种在一种给药方案(透皮给药东莨菪碱)中报告更频繁的副作用。