Kaldor J, Harris J A, Glazer E, Glaser S, Neutra R, Mayberry R, Nelson V, Robinson L, Reed D
Environ Health Perspect. 1984 Mar;54:319-32. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8454319.
An ecologic study design was used to investigate the relationship between exposure to air emissions produced by the petroleum and chemical industries, and average annual cancer incidence and major cause mortality rates among whites in Contra Costa County, California. Estimates for the exposure to major industrial sources of sulfur dioxide, hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen were used to subdivide the county by level of exposure to petroleum refinery and chemical plant emissions. Cancer incidence and major cause mortality rates were then calculated for whites in each of the exposure areas. In both males and females, residential exposure to petroleum and chemical air emissions was associated with an increased incidence of cancer of the buccal cavity and pharynx. In males, age-adjusted incidence rates for cancers of the stomach, lung, prostate and kidney and urinary organs were also associated with petroleum and chemical plant air emission exposures. In both sexes, we found a strong positive association between degree of residential exposure and death rates from cardiovascular disease and cancer, and a less strong positive association between exposure and death rates from cerebrovascular disease. There was also a positive association in men for deaths from cirrhosis of the liver. Although these observed associations occurred across areas of similar socioeconomic and broad occupational class, confounding variables and the "ecologic fallacy" must be considered as possible explanations. In particular, the stronger findings in men suggest an occupational explanation of the cancer incidence trends, and the effect observed in cirrhosis mortality suggests that lifestyle variables such as alcohol consumption were not adequately controlled for. While the public health implications of our findings remain unclear, the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant follow-up studies based on individual data in which possible biases can be more readily controlled.
采用生态研究设计来调查加利福尼亚州康特拉科斯塔县白人接触石油和化学工业产生的空气排放物与年均癌症发病率及主要死因死亡率之间的关系。利用对二氧化硫、碳氢化合物和氮氧化物等主要工业源的接触估计值,按石油炼制厂和化工厂排放物的接触水平对该县进行细分。然后计算每个接触区域白人的癌症发病率和主要死因死亡率。在男性和女性中,居住环境中接触石油和化学空气排放物均与口腔和咽部癌症发病率增加有关。在男性中,经年龄调整的胃癌、肺癌、前列腺癌以及肾癌和泌尿系统癌症的发病率也与石油炼制厂和化工厂的空气排放物接触有关。在两性中,我们发现居住接触程度与心血管疾病和癌症死亡率之间存在很强的正相关,而接触与脑血管疾病死亡率之间的正相关较弱。在男性中,肝硬化死亡也存在正相关。尽管这些观察到的关联在社会经济和广泛职业类别相似的区域中都出现了,但混杂变量和“生态谬误”必须被视为可能的解释。特别是,男性中更强的研究结果表明癌症发病率趋势可从职业角度解释,而肝硬化死亡率中观察到的影响表明,诸如饮酒等生活方式变量未得到充分控制。虽然我们研究结果对公共卫生的影响尚不清楚,但所呈现的证据足以支持基于个体数据的后续研究,在这类研究中可能的偏差能更容易得到控制。