Harris S J, Hansen R M, Fulton A B
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1984 Jul;25(7):782-6.
In a variety of ocular disorders, square-wave gratings yield more optimistic estimates of visual acuity than more complex stimuli such as letters. However, for clinical vision testing of preverbal patients, square-wave gratings are usually employed in conjunction with preferential looking procedures. We developed a complex stimulus--a schematic face--for use in preferential looking procedures. Using the method of constant stimuli, the acuities of 1-, 3-, and 5-month-old infants with normal eyes were estimated using schematic faces and square-wave gratings. Within each age group, thresholds for face and grating stimuli were not significantly different, but psychometric functions obtained with faces were significantly steeper than those obtained with square-wave gratings. This suggests that complex stimuli such as the schematic face could yield more precise acuity estimates than gratings in some pediatric eye patients.
在多种眼部疾病中,与字母等更复杂的刺激物相比,方波光栅对视敏度的估计更为乐观。然而,对于不会说话的患者进行临床视力测试时,方波光栅通常与优先注视程序结合使用。我们开发了一种用于优先注视程序的复杂刺激物——一张示意性面孔。使用恒定刺激法,用示意性面孔和方波光栅对1个月、3个月和5个月大的正常眼睛婴儿的视敏度进行了估计。在每个年龄组中,面孔和光栅刺激的阈值没有显著差异,但用面孔获得的心理测量函数比方波光栅获得的函数明显更陡峭。这表明,在一些儿科眼科患者中,像示意性面孔这样的复杂刺激物可能比光栅对视敏度的估计更精确。