Suppr超能文献

硝苯地平的生物利用度:两种制剂的比较。

Bioavailability of nifedipine: a comparison between two preparations.

作者信息

Zylber-Katz E, Koren G, Granit L, Levy M

出版信息

Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1984 Apr-Jun;5(2):109-15. doi: 10.1002/bdd.2510050204.

Abstract

In a random cross-over study, eight healthy volunteers received single 10 mg doses of either nifedipine capsule (Adalat, Bayer) or nifedipine tablets (Taro) after an overnight fast. The areas under the serum concentration time curves were not significantly different (AUC0----infinity 319.8 +/- 28.0 (SEM) ng ml-1 h-1 for capsules, 260.8 +/- 15.3 ng ml-1 h-1 for tablets). The peak serum levels and the time of their occurrence were 162.4 +/- 23.4 ng ml-1 at 30 min for capsules and 43.0 +/- 3.0 ng ml-1 at 1-2 h for tablets, indicating that the absorption of nifedipine from the capsule is faster than from the tablet form. Clinical symptoms of vasodilation corresponded with the nifedipine peak levels. We conclude that although the bioavailability in general of the two preparations is similar, the therapeutic equivalence may differ. Depending on the therapeutic indication each preparation may have its merits.

摘要

在一项随机交叉研究中,8名健康志愿者在禁食过夜后,单次服用10毫克剂量的硝苯地平胶囊(拜耳公司的心痛定)或硝苯地平片(塔罗公司生产)。血清浓度-时间曲线下面积无显著差异(胶囊的AUC0-无穷大 为319.8±28.0(SEM)纳克/毫升·小时,片剂为260.8±15.3纳克/毫升·小时)。血清峰值水平及其出现时间分别为:胶囊在30分钟时为162.4±23.4纳克/毫升,片剂在1-2小时时为43.0±3.0纳克/毫升,这表明硝苯地平从胶囊中的吸收比片剂更快。血管舒张的临床症状与硝苯地平峰值水平相符。我们得出结论,虽然两种制剂的总体生物利用度相似,但治疗等效性可能不同。根据治疗指征,每种制剂可能都有其优点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验