Weinack O M, Snoeyenbos G H, Smyser C F, Soerjadi A S
Avian Dis. 1982 Jul-Sep;26(3):585-95.
Both the native intestinal microflora of chickens that protected chicks against salmonellae and Escherichia coli and native turkey intestinal microflora were evaluated for their reciprocal protective capacity in both species against Salmonella typhimurium and a pathogenic strain of E. coli. Nalidixic-acid-resistant forms of the S. typhimurium and E. coli strains were used in seeder-bird and individual-bird challenge tests. Reciprocal protection was provided by native chicken and turkey intestinal microflora in chicks and poults against S. typhimurium and the pathogenic strain of E. coli. The chicken and turkey microflora appeared to be equally effective in protecting the two species from S. typhimurium, but protection against E. coli was somewhat greater in the chicken than in the turkey.
对保护雏鸡抵御沙门氏菌和大肠杆菌的鸡的天然肠道微生物群以及火鸡的天然肠道微生物群,评估了它们在两种禽类中对鼠伤寒沙门氏菌和一种致病性大肠杆菌菌株的相互保护能力。在种禽和个体禽类攻毒试验中使用了对萘啶酸耐药的鼠伤寒沙门氏菌和大肠杆菌菌株。鸡和火鸡的天然肠道微生物群为雏鸡和小火鸡提供了针对鼠伤寒沙门氏菌和致病性大肠杆菌菌株的相互保护。鸡和火鸡的微生物群在保护两种禽类抵御鼠伤寒沙门氏菌方面似乎同样有效,但鸡对大肠杆菌的保护作用比火鸡稍强。