Suppr超能文献

门诊患儿菌血症的检测:传统血培养方法与卡斯塔涅达血培养的比较

Detection of bacteraemia in children seen in the outpatient department: a comparison of conventional blood culture methods and a Castaneda blood culture.

作者信息

Brook I, Gruenwald L D

出版信息

Microbios. 1982;35(139):17-20.

PMID:6759878
Abstract

Modified Castaneda blood culture bottles were used to diagnose bacteraemia in children attending the out patient clinic. Bacterial growth was detected in twelve out of 147 patients (8%), in both the routine and Castaneda blood culture bottles. Streptococcus pneumoniae was recovered in nine patients (6%), and H. influenzae in three patients (2%). The average length of time required to identify the organisms utilizing the routine blood culture bottles was 2 days (range 1 to 4 days), while the average time utilizing Castaneda bottles was 3.5 days (range 1 to 6 days). Castaneda blood bottles were found in this work to be effective in the detection of bacteraemia in children, and because of their simplicity they may serve for the detection of bacteraemia by physicians in general practice.

摘要

改良的卡斯塔涅达血培养瓶用于诊断门诊就诊儿童的菌血症。在147例患者中的12例(8%)常规血培养瓶和卡斯塔涅达血培养瓶中均检测到细菌生长。9例患者(6%)分离出肺炎链球菌,3例患者(2%)分离出流感嗜血杆菌。使用常规血培养瓶鉴定病原体所需的平均时间为2天(范围1至4天),而使用卡斯塔涅达血培养瓶的平均时间为3.5天(范围1至6天)。本研究发现卡斯塔涅达血培养瓶在检测儿童菌血症方面有效,并且由于其操作简单,全科医生也可用于菌血症的检测。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验