McClean S W, Elin R J, Alling D, Chesler R, Siegel S, Utter A R, Green M
Clin Biochem. 1980 Aug;13(4):164-70. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(80)91079-6.
We compared four instruments, [Sequential Multiple Analyzer Computer (SMAC), AutoAnalyzer II (AAII), StatLyte and PVA-4] for the determination of Na, K, Cl and CO2 using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standard's (NCCLS) protocol (PSEP-1) for evaluation of precision and accuracy of automated instruments. The protocol was applied concurrently to all four instruments. The repeatability results showed SMAC to have the highest precision among-days for K, Cl, and CO2 whereas StatLyte showed the highest precision among-days for Na. The PVA-4 had the best within-run precision for Na and Cl while the AAII and SMAC had the best within-run precision for K and CO2 respectively. Systematic biases among the instruments were small for Na and K. The AAII exhibited a nearly constant bias at all concentrations of Cl relative to the other three instruments. For CO2 the SMAC showed a large proportional bias compared with the other three instruments.
我们使用美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)的方案(PSEP - 1)来评估自动化仪器的精密度和准确性,比较了四种仪器[连续多通道分析仪计算机(SMAC)、自动分析仪II(AAII)、StatLyte和PVA - 4]用于测定钠、钾、氯和二氧化碳的情况。该方案同时应用于所有四种仪器。重复性结果表明,SMAC在钾、氯和二氧化碳的日间精密度方面最高,而StatLyte在钠的日间精密度方面最高。PVA - 4在钠和氯的批内精密度方面最佳,而AAII和SMAC分别在钾和二氧化碳的批内精密度方面最佳。仪器之间钠和钾的系统偏差较小。相对于其他三种仪器,AAII在所有氯浓度下都表现出几乎恒定的偏差。对于二氧化碳,与其他三种仪器相比,SMAC表现出较大的比例偏差。