• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Is your enema really necessary?你的灌肠真的有必要吗?
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Apr 18;282(6272):1269-71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6272.1269.
2
Enema versus no-enema in pregnant women on admission in labor: a randomized controlled trial.分娩入院时孕妇灌肠与不灌肠的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Dec;88(12):1763-7.
3
Obstetric performance, perinatal outcome and risk of infection to the newborn in spontaneous and artificial rupture of membranes during labour.分娩期间自然破膜与人工破膜的产科表现、围产期结局及新生儿感染风险
Ceylon Med J. 1998 Mar;43(1):11-5.
4
Does saline enema during the first stage of labour reduce the incidence of Clostridium difficile colonization in neonates? A randomized controlled trial.第一产程中使用生理盐水灌肠是否会降低新生儿艰难梭菌定植的发生率?一项随机对照试验。
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Jul;99(3):356-359. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
5
Hot, high and horrible. Should routine enemas still be given to women in labour?炎热、高危且可怕。分娩中的女性仍应常规灌肠吗?
Cent Afr J Med. 1993 Jun;39(6):117-20.
6
Effects of social support during parturition on maternal and infant morbidity.分娩期间社会支持对母婴发病率的影响。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Sep 6;293(6547):585-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6547.585.
7
Intravenous fluids for reducing the duration of labour in low risk nulliparous women.用于缩短低风险初产妇产程的静脉输液。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 18;2013(6):CD007715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007715.pub2.
8
Enema prior to labor: a controversial routine in Taiwan.分娩前灌肠:台湾一项有争议的常规操作。
J Nurs Res. 2005 Dec;13(4):263-70.
9
Enemas during labour.分娩期间的灌肠剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD000330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000330.pub2.
10
The Bristol third stage trial: active versus physiological management of third stage of labour.布里斯托尔第三阶段试验:分娩第三产程的主动管理与生理性管理
BMJ. 1988 Nov 19;297(6659):1295-300. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6659.1295.

引用本文的文献

1
Enema Administration During Labor: Pregnant Women's Perspective and Knowledge.分娩期间的灌肠给药:孕妇的观点与知识
SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 Nov 20;8:23779608221139148. doi: 10.1177/23779608221139148. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
2
Enemas during labour.分娩期间的灌肠剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 22;2013(7):CD000330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000330.pub4.
3
Effects of high volume saline enemas vs no enema during labour--The N-Ma Randomised Controlled Trial [ISRCTN43153145].分娩期间大量生理盐水灌肠与不灌肠的效果——N-Ma随机对照试验[ISRCTN43153145]
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2006 Mar 19;6:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-6-8.
4
Childbirth practice should take women's wishes into account.分娩实践应考虑女性的意愿。
BMJ. 1996 Dec 14;313(7071):1557. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7071.1557a.
5
Aseptic rituals unmasked.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Dec 15;289(6459):1642-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6459.1642.
6
Routine practices in perinatal care.围产期护理的常规做法。
CMAJ. 1986 May 1;134(9):994-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Bowel habit in pregnancy.孕期的排便习惯。
Digestion. 1971;4(4):216-22. doi: 10.1159/000197122.

你的灌肠真的有必要吗?

Is your enema really necessary?

作者信息

Romney M L, Gordon H

出版信息

Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Apr 18;282(6272):1269-71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6272.1269.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.282.6272.1269
PMID:6784809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1505361/
Abstract

Two hundred and seventy-four women admitted for delivery of singleton infants were studied for the effects of a preparatory enema on faecal contamination, duration of labour, and the incidence of infection in the newborn. Altogether 149 of the women were given an enema (controls) and 125 were not. The two groups showed no significant difference in the degree of faecal contamination during the first and second stages of labour, and the incidences of gross contamination were similar. Contamination after an enema was especially difficult to control, since it was more likely to be fluid. Seven neonates in each group showed evidence of infection, bowel organisms being isolated from four in the no-enema group and two in the control group. Durations of labour, though not strictly comparable, were similar in the two groups. The findings suggest that when preparing for normal labour the enema should be reserved for women who have not had their bowels open in the past 24 hours and have an obviously loaded rectum on initial pelvic examination.

摘要

对274名因单胎分娩入院的妇女进行了研究,以探讨灌肠准备对粪便污染、产程及新生儿感染发生率的影响。共有149名妇女接受了灌肠(对照组),125名未接受。两组在第一产程和第二产程中的粪便污染程度无显著差异,重度污染发生率相似。灌肠后的污染尤其难以控制,因为其更可能是液体状。每组有7名新生儿出现感染迹象,未灌肠组4名新生儿和对照组2名新生儿的肠道细菌被分离出来。两组的产程虽不完全可比,但相似。研究结果表明,在为正常分娩做准备时,灌肠应仅用于过去24小时未解大便且初次盆腔检查时直肠明显充盈的妇女。