Prendiville W J, Harding J E, Elbourne D R, Stirrat G M
Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bristol Maternity Hospital, Avon.
BMJ. 1988 Nov 19;297(6659):1295-300. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6659.1295.
To compare the effects on fetal and maternal morbidity of routine active management of third stage of labour and expectant (physiological) management, in particular to determine whether active management reduced incidence of postpartum haemorrhage.
Randomised trial of active versus physiological management. Women entered trial on admission to labour ward with allocation revealed just before vaginal delivery. Five months into trial high rate of postpartum haemorrhage in physiological group (16.5% v 3.8%) prompted modification of protocol to exclude more women and allow those allocated to physiological group who needed some active management to be switched to fully active management. Sample size of 3900 was planned, but even after protocol modification a planned interim analysis after first 1500 deliveries showed continuing high postpartum haemorrhage rate in physiological group and study was stopped.
Maternity hospital.
Of 4709 women delivered from 1 January 1986 to 31 January 1987, 1695 were admitted to trial and allocated randomly to physiological (849) or active (846) management. Reasons for exclusion were: refusal, antepartum haemorrhage, cardiac disease, breech presentation, multiple pregnancy, intrauterine death, and, after May 1986, ritodrine given two hours before delivery, anticoagulant treatment, and any condition needing a particular management of third stage.
All but six women allocated to active management actually received it, having prophylactic oxytocic, cord clamping before placental delivery, and cord traction; whereas just under half those allocated to physiological management achieved it. A fifth of physiological group received prophylactic oxytocic, two fifths underwent cord traction and just over half clamping of the cord before placental delivery.
Reduction in incidence of postpartum haemorrhage from 7.5% under physiological management to 5.0% under active management.
Incidence of postpartum haemorrhage was 5.9% in active management group and 17.9% in physiological group (odds ratio 3.13; 95% confidence interval 2.3 to 4.2), a contrast reflected in other indices of blood loss. In physiological group third stage was longer (median 15 min v 5 min) and more women needed therapeutic oxytocics (29.7% v 6.4%). Apgar scores at one and five minutes and incidence of neonatal respiratory problems were not significantly different between groups. Babies in physiological group weighed mean of 85 g more than those in active group. When women allocated to and receiving active management (840) were compared with those who actually received physiological management (403) active management still produced lower rate of postpartum haemorrhage (odds ratio 2.4;95% CI1.6 to 3.7).
Policy of active management practised in this trial reduces incidence of postpartum haemorrhage, shortens third stage, and results in reduced neonatal packed cell volume.
比较第三产程常规积极处理与期待(生理性)处理对胎儿及产妇发病率的影响,尤其要确定积极处理是否能降低产后出血的发生率。
积极处理与生理性处理的随机试验。妇女在进入产房产科病房时进入试验,在阴道分娩前公布分组情况。试验进行五个月时,生理性处理组产后出血发生率很高(16.5%对3.8%),促使修改方案,排除更多妇女,并允许那些分配到生理性处理组但需要一些积极处理的妇女改为完全积极处理。计划样本量为3900,但即使在方案修改后,在最初1500例分娩后进行的计划中期分析显示,生理性处理组产后出血率仍持续较高,于是研究停止。
妇产医院。
在1986年1月1日至1987年1月31日分娩的4709名妇女中,1695名进入试验并随机分配到生理性处理组(849名)或积极处理组(846名)。排除原因包括:拒绝、产前出血、心脏病、臀位、多胎妊娠、宫内死亡,以及1986年5月以后,分娩前两小时使用利托君、抗凝治疗以及任何需要对第三产程进行特殊处理的情况。
除6名分配到积极处理组的妇女外,其余实际上都接受了积极处理,包括预防性使用催产素、胎盘娩出前钳夹脐带和牵拉脐带;而分配到生理性处理组的妇女中,不到一半实际做到了这一点。生理性处理组五分之一的妇女接受了预防性催产素,五分之二的妇女接受了脐带牵拉,略超过一半的妇女在胎盘娩出前钳夹了脐带。
将产后出血发生率从生理性处理时的7.5%降至积极处理时的5.0%。
积极处理组产后出血发生率为5.9%,生理性处理组为17.9%(优势比3.13;95%置信区间2.3至4.2),这种差异在其他失血指标中也有体现。生理性处理组第三产程更长(中位数15分钟对5分钟),更多妇女需要使用治疗性催产素(29.7%对6.4%)。两组之间1分钟和5分钟时的阿普加评分以及新生儿呼吸问题发生率无显著差异。生理性处理组的婴儿平均比积极处理组的婴儿重85克。将分配并接受积极处理的妇女(840名)与实际接受生理性处理的妇女(403名)进行比较时,积极处理仍能使产后出血发生率更低(优势比2.4;95%置信区间1.6至3.7)。
本试验中实施的积极处理策略可降低产后出血发生率,缩短第三产程,并使新生儿血细胞比容降低。