Ingram G I, O'Brien P F, North W R
Scand J Haematol Suppl. 1980;37:64-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1980.tb01342.x.
A study has been carried out in two stages to compare the sensitivity of different Partial Thromboplastin Time (P.T.T.) methods to partial deficiencies of factor VIII. In Stage 1, 63 laboratories throughout the world compared their own methods with a reference method, all using samples of the same three mild haemophilic plasmas. Wide variation was found between laboratories using the same method, especially for those methods which were not well standardised. There was fairly good agreement for the reference method. All methods correctly diagnosed the three mild haemophilic plasmas, but their factor VIII levels were rather low. Stage 2 was restricted to seven laboratories in Great Britain, comparing seven well-standardised commercial methods and the same reference method. A much wider range of abnormal plasmas was tested, and a variety of normal ones. P.T.T.'s for all plasmas (factor VIII levels from 5 to 58 iu/dL) fell outside the normal range by all methods, with a few exceptions. It was not possible to rank the methods in any order.
已分两个阶段开展了一项研究,以比较不同部分凝血活酶时间(P.T.T.)方法对因子VIII部分缺乏的敏感性。在第一阶段,全球63个实验室将各自的方法与一种参考方法进行比较,所有实验室均使用相同的三种轻度血友病血浆样本。使用相同方法的实验室之间存在很大差异,尤其是那些标准化程度不高的方法。参考方法的一致性相当好。所有方法均正确诊断出这三种轻度血友病血浆,但其因子VIII水平相当低。第二阶段限于英国的七个实验室,比较七种标准化良好的商业方法和相同的参考方法。测试了范围更广的异常血浆以及各种正常血浆。所有方法检测的所有血浆(因子VIII水平为5至58国际单位/分升),除少数例外,其部分凝血活酶时间均超出正常范围。无法对这些方法进行任何排序。