Sako K, Loré J M, Kaufman S, Razack M S, Bakamjian V, Reese P
J Surg Oncol. 1981;16(4):391-402. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930160413.
Sixty-nine patients were entered in a randomized study to determine the usefulness and practicality of parenteral hyperalimentation (TPN) in preparing and supporting patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radical resections. The patients were stratified by nutritional status and prognosis and randomization were done within each strata to TPN or control. Minimum full TPN was given at 35 calories/kgm/day for at least 14 days postoperatively. Eight patients received preoperative TPN also. Control patients received customary enteral alimentation by feeding tubes. Under the conditions of this particular study, the administration schedules, and type of solutions used, we were unable to demonstrate any superiority of TPN over conventional enteral nutrition in terms of immune parameters, wound healing, complications, and survival.
69名患者进入一项随机研究,以确定胃肠外高营养(全胃肠外营养)在准备和支持接受根治性切除术的头颈癌患者方面的有效性和实用性。患者按营养状况和预后分层,并在各层内随机分为接受全胃肠外营养组或对照组。术后至少14天给予最低限度的全量全胃肠外营养,剂量为35千卡/千克/天。8名患者还接受了术前全胃肠外营养。对照组患者通过喂食管接受常规肠内营养。在这项特定研究的条件、给药方案和所用溶液类型下,我们无法在免疫参数、伤口愈合、并发症和生存率方面证明全胃肠外营养优于传统肠内营养。