Kant K S, Pollak V E, Cathey M, Goetz D, Berlin R
Kidney Int. 1981 May;19(5):728-38. doi: 10.1038/ki.1981.73.
The practice of multiple use of dialyzers was examined over a 15-month period on all 104 patients in a chronic maintenance hemodialysis facility. A computerized medical information system permitted analysis of the incidence of events in over 10,000 successive hemodialyses. It also allowed analysis of the events in 27 patients dialyzed for a total of 655 months successively in two units practicing single and multiple dialyzer use. The incidence of complications during dialysis, of complications that might be related to infection, and the rate of hospitalization was not greater when the 27 patients were dialyzed in the unit practicing multiple use as compared with the rates in the unit practicing single use. Events possibly associated with infection did not occur more frequently during dialyses in which the dialyzer had been used between 2 and 20 times than they did with the initial use of the dialyzer. With successive dialyzer use, there was no significant change in the ability to remove fluid or in the dialysance of urea and creatinine. The neutropenia that characteristically occurs early in dialysis was substantially less with reused dialyzers than with their initial use. Under the operating conditions described, we conclude that multiple dialyzer use over a 15-month period is safe, efficacious, and is not associated with an increased rate of infection, of morbidity from any cause, or of mortality.
在一家慢性维持性血液透析机构中,对104例患者进行了为期15个月的透析器复用实践研究。一个计算机化的医学信息系统允许对超过10000次连续血液透析中的事件发生率进行分析。它还允许对27例患者在两个分别采用单次和复用透析器使用的单元中连续透析总计655个月的事件进行分析。与单次使用透析器的单元相比,当这27例患者在复用透析器的单元中进行透析时,透析期间并发症、可能与感染相关的并发症以及住院率并未更高。在透析器使用2至20次的透析过程中,可能与感染相关的事件发生频率并不高于透析器初次使用时。随着透析器的连续使用,清除液体的能力以及尿素和肌酐的透析率没有显著变化。复用透析器时,透析早期典型出现的中性粒细胞减少症比初次使用时明显减轻。在所述的操作条件下,我们得出结论,在15个月期间复用透析器是安全、有效的,并且与感染率、任何原因导致的发病率或死亡率的增加无关。