de Klerk G, Mattie H, Spierdijk J
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1981;32(2):131-9.
A comparative study on the effects on circulation and respiration of buprenorphine and methadone was performed on a group of four healthy volunteers in a double blind way. Both drugs were given by continuous slow i.v. infusion. Before and after administration of the drugs, the subjects breathed in an open, resp. closed system, gas mixtures of 50% O2 / 50% N2 resp. 50% O2 / 43% N2 / 7% CO2. After each breathing/rebreathing period pupil diameters were measured photographically. The effects on respiration were calculated as shifts in vol. % CO2 necessary to obtain a standard respiratory minute volume. Analysis of variance showed a dose-independent inhibition of respiration of buprenorphine and a dose-dependent inhibition of methadone. Both drugs caused a weakly dose-dependent miosis. There were no significant dose-dependent effects on circulation and both drugs caused a similar side effect profile.
采用双盲法对一组4名健康志愿者进行了丁丙诺啡和美沙酮对循环和呼吸影响的比较研究。两种药物均通过持续缓慢静脉输注给药。在给药前和给药后,受试者分别在开放系统和封闭系统中呼吸50% O₂ / 50% N₂以及50% O₂ / 43% N₂ / 7% CO₂的混合气体。在每个呼吸/再呼吸周期后,通过摄影测量瞳孔直径。呼吸效应以获得标准呼吸分钟通气量所需的二氧化碳体积百分比变化来计算。方差分析显示丁丙诺啡对呼吸的抑制与剂量无关,美沙酮对呼吸的抑制呈剂量依赖性。两种药物均引起弱剂量依赖性的瞳孔缩小。对循环无显著剂量依赖性影响,两种药物引起的副作用谱相似。