基于社区的长期护理的成本效益：佐治亚州替代健康服务项目的当前研究结果
Cost-effectiveness of community-based long-term care: current findings of Georgia's alternative health services project.
作者信息
Skellie F A, Mobley G M, Coan R E
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 1982 Apr;72(4):353-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.4.353.
Abstract
A study of the cost-effectiveness of community-based, long-term care was conducted with voluntary enrollees eligible for Medicaid reimbursed nursing home care. One year after enrollment, average longevity was greater for the 575 clients in the experiment group, but average Medicaid plus Medicare costs for this group were higher than for the 172 clients in the control group. Among those more at risk of entering a nursing home, costs for persons in the experimental group were somewhat lower than for those in the control group. The results suggest that community-based services targeted to those most at risk of institutionalization may be cost-effective.
摘要
一项针对符合医疗补助报销条件的养老院护理的自愿参保者进行了基于社区的长期护理成本效益研究。入组一年后，实验组的575名客户平均寿命更长，但该组的医疗补助加医疗保险平均成本高于对照组的172名客户。在那些更有可能进入养老院的人群中，实验组人员的成本略低于对照组人员。结果表明，针对最有可能被机构收容的人群的社区服务可能具有成本效益。
相似文献
1
Cost-effectiveness of community-based long-term care: current findings of Georgia's alternative health services project.基于社区的长期护理的成本效益：佐治亚州替代健康服务项目的当前研究结果
Am J Public Health. 1982 Apr;72(4):353-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.4.353.
2
The evaluation of the National Long Term Care Demonstration. 8. The effect of channeling on health and long-term care costs.国家长期护理示范项目评估。8. 分流对健康及长期护理成本的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1988 Apr;23(1):129-42.
3
Health Care Expenditures After Initiating Long-term Services and Supports in the Community Versus in a Nursing Facility.在社区与护理机构开始接受长期服务和支持后的医疗保健支出。
Med Care. 2016 Mar;54(3):221-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000491.
4
The effects of state-level expenditures for home- and community-based services on the risk of becoming a long-stay nursing home resident after hip fracture.州级家庭和社区服务支出对髋部骨折后成为长期疗养院居民风险的影响。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Mar;27(3):953-961. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3327-3. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
5
Cost savings from home and community-based services: Arizona's capitated Medicaid long-term care program.家庭和社区服务带来的成本节约：亚利桑那州的按人头付费医疗补助长期护理项目。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1997 Dec;22(6):1329-57. doi: 10.1215/03616878-22-6-1329.
6
State commitment to home and community-based services: effects on independent living for older unmarried women.国家对居家和社区服务的承诺：对老年未婚女性独立生活的影响。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2005;17(1):1-18. doi: 10.1300/J031v17n01_01.
7
The relative benefits and cost of medicaid home- and community-based services in Florida.佛罗里达州医疗补助居家和社区服务的相对收益与成本。
Gerontologist. 2006 Aug;46(4):483-94. doi: 10.1093/geront/46.4.483.
8
Policy issues in long term care: a model of transitions.
J S C Med Assoc. 1986 Jul;82(7):464-6.
9
HCBS Spending and Nursing Home Admissions for 1915(c) Waiver Enrollees.1915(c) 豁免参保人的居家和社区基础服务支出及疗养院入院情况
J Aging Soc Policy. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(5):395-412. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2017.1319714. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
10
Integrated Home- and Community-Based Services Improve Community Survival Among Independence at Home Medicare Beneficiaries Without Increasing Medicaid Costs.综合性居家和社区服务可提高居家 Medicare 受益人的社区生存率，而不会增加医疗补助成本。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jul;67(7):1495-1501. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15968. Epub 2019 May 10.
引用本文的文献
1
Home or foster home care versus institutional long-term care for functionally dependent older people.功能依赖老年人的居家或寄养家庭护理与机构长期护理对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 3;4(4):CD009844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009844.pub2.
2
Medical day hospital care for older people versus alternative forms of care.老年人的日间医院护理与其他护理形式对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 23;2015(6):CD001730. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001730.pub3.
3
The impact of Medicaid peer support utilization on cost.医疗补助同伴支持服务的使用对成本的影响。
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2014 Feb 18;4(1). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.004.01.a04. eCollection 2014.
4
Managing programs for the elderly: design of a social information systems.老年人管理项目：社会信息系统的设计
Health Care Financ Rev. 1983 Winter;5(2):11-23.
5
Systematic review of day hospital care for elderly people. The Day Hospital Group.老年人日间医院护理的系统评价。日间医院小组。
BMJ. 1999 Mar 27;318(7187):837-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7187.837.
6
Community care for the elderly: is it really better?老年人的社区护理：真的更好吗？
CMAJ. 1993 Feb 1;148(3):393-6.
7
The cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation in the home: a study of Swedish elderly.家庭康复的成本效益：一项针对瑞典老年人的研究。
Am J Public Health. 1993 Mar;83(3):356-62. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.3.356.
8
Apples and oranges? A review of evaluations of community-based long-term care.风马牛不相及？基于社区的长期护理评估综述。
Health Serv Res. 1985 Oct;20(4):461-88.
9
Seven reasons why it is so difficult to make community-based long-term care cost-effective.社区长期护理难以实现成本效益的七个原因。
Health Serv Res. 1985 Oct;20(4):423-33.
10
Cost-effectiveness implications based on a comparison of nursing home and home health case mix.基于养老院和家庭健康病例组合比较的成本效益影响。
Health Serv Res. 1985 Oct;20(4):387-405.
本文引用的文献
1
Alternatives to institutionalization for the aged: viability and cost effectiveness.
Aged Care Serv Rev. 1978 Jan-Feb;1(1):1, 3-16.
2
Expanded home-based care for the impaired elderly: solution or pipe dream?为身体机能受损的老年人提供扩展型居家护理：是解决方案还是白日梦？
Am J Public Health. 1980 May;70(5):514-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.5.514.
3
Community-based long-term care and mortality: preliminary findings of Georgia's alternative health services project.
Gerontologist. 1980 Jun;20(3 Pt 1):372-9. doi: 10.1093/geront/20.3_part_1.372.
4
Progress in development of the index of ADL.日常生活活动能力指数的发展进展。
Gerontologist. 1970 Spring;10(1):20-30. doi: 10.1093/geront/10.1_part_1.20.
5
A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients.一份用于评估老年患者器质性脑功能缺损的简短便携式精神状态问卷。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975 Oct;23(10):433-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1975.tb00927.x.
6
The Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale: a revision.费城老年医学中心士气量表：修订版
J Gerontol. 1975 Jan;30(1):85-9. doi: 10.1093/geronj/30.1.85.
7
Home health care cost effectiveness: an overview of the literature.
Public Health Rep. 1979 Jul-Aug;94(4):305-11.
Zotero 插件