Dunlop B D
Am J Public Health. 1980 May;70(5):514-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.5.514.
Benefits assumed by those calling for massive expansion of home health care to include preventive, health-supportive services for the dependent aged--reduced institutionalization, reduced stress among family caregivers, and enhanced life-satisfaction for the dependent elderly--have been the objects of inadequate research and reflection. Advocates are unable to specify exactly what kind of person could benefit or who would seek to use such services. The little evidence that exists suggests that these benefits may be realized only partially and/or only among select segments of the population affected. A significantly reduced rate of institutionalization appears especially questionable. Only for a relatively small group, those mildly impaired persons without close kin (who now sometimes end up in lower level nursing homes or domiciliary care homes due to absence of this resource), does expansion of long-term maintenance services appear at this point to hold such potential. Local experiments with expanded home-based programs suggest that there may be a number of factors which could limit demand for such services. Carefully designed research to address these issues is needed.
那些呼吁大幅扩大居家医疗保健范围,为依赖他人照料的老年人提供预防性、健康支持性服务的人所设想的益处——减少机构收容、减轻家庭照料者的压力以及提高依赖他人照料的老年人的生活满意度——一直是研究和思考不足的对象。倡导者无法确切说明什么样的人会从中受益,或者谁会寻求使用这些服务。现有的少量证据表明,这些益处可能只能部分实现,和/或仅在受影响人群的特定部分中实现。机构收容率显著降低这一点尤其值得怀疑。目前,只有相对较小的一部分人,即那些没有近亲的轻度受损者(由于缺乏这种资源,他们现在有时最终会住进较低级别的养老院或家庭护理院),扩大长期维持服务在此时似乎才有这种潜力。当地扩大居家项目的实验表明,可能有许多因素会限制对这类服务需求。需要开展精心设计的研究来解决这些问题。