Tindall R S
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1981;377:316-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb33741.x.
Antibody to human acetylcholine receptor (AChR Ab) in myasthenia gravis (MG) correlates with clinical (Osserman) classification. Patients in remission R) or with ocular only (I) symptoms differed significantly from those with generalized disease (IIA, IIB, III, IV) (p less than 0.01, p less than 0.05 respectively). Patients with mild generalized disease (IIA) differed significantly from those with acute severe (III) or chronic severe (IV) disease (p less than 0.01). However, within each clinical class titers ranged over two or three orders of magnitude. This variation in AChR Ab titer for patients with similar diseases severity was not explained by differences in immunoglobulin class. All patients produced IgG AChR Ab and occasional patients produced IgM or IgA at less than 10% of their IgG titer. No IgM to IgG switch was identified. In MG patients negative for AChR Ab by immunoprecipitation assay, blockade of toxin binding to extracted human AChR could still be identified indicating antibody specificity to the toxin binding site. The avidity of AChR Ab for receptor assayed in six myasthenic patients with differing severities of disease, varied widely with T1/2 (time to half-maximal binding) ranges from 25 to 81 minutes. However, differences in AChR Ab avidity did not explain differences in severity of disease in patients with similar titers. AChR Ab was fractionated in six patients into IgG kappa and IgG lambda; in four patients AChR Ab activity could be demonstrated in both fractions. Thus, differences among MG patients as a group are due to production of several AChR Ab idiotypes, with individual patients being oligoclonal or polyclonal as well. Differences in IgG subclass (complement fixation) and site of attachment of AChR Ab to receptor subunits may resolve these differences.
重症肌无力(MG)患者体内的抗人乙酰胆碱受体抗体(AChR Ab)与临床(奥斯勒曼)分类相关。病情缓解(R)或仅有眼部症状(I)的患者与患有全身性疾病(IIA、IIB、III、IV)的患者有显著差异(分别为p<0.01,p<0.05)。轻度全身性疾病(IIA)患者与急性重度(III)或慢性重度(IV)疾病患者有显著差异(p<0.01)。然而,在每个临床类别中,滴度范围跨越两到三个数量级。疾病严重程度相似的患者中AChR Ab滴度的这种变化无法用免疫球蛋白类别差异来解释。所有患者均产生IgG型AChR Ab,少数患者产生IgM或IgA,其水平低于IgG滴度的10%。未发现IgM向IgG的转换。在免疫沉淀试验中AChR Ab呈阴性的MG患者中,仍可鉴定出毒素与提取的人AChR结合的阻断情况,表明抗体对毒素结合位点具有特异性。在六名病情严重程度不同的重症肌无力患者中检测的AChR Ab与受体的亲和力差异很大,T1/2(达到最大结合一半的时间)范围为25至81分钟。然而,AChR Ab亲和力的差异并不能解释滴度相似的患者在疾病严重程度上的差异。在六名患者中将AChR Ab分离为IgGκ和IgGλ;在四名患者中,两个组分均显示出AChR Ab活性。因此,MG患者群体之间的差异是由于产生了几种AChR Ab独特型,个体患者既有寡克隆的也有多克隆的。IgG亚类(补体结合)以及AChR Ab与受体亚基结合位点的差异可能会解释这些差异。