Comparative effects of dietary administration of 2(3)-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyanisole and 3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxytoluene on several hepatic enzyme activities in mice and rats.

Effects of feeding mice and rats with 2(3)-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyanisole (BHA) and 3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxytoluene (BHT), the two most commonly used food-additive phenolic antioxidants with known anticarcinogenic properties but with only minor differences in their chemical structures, have been compared to search for common effects between the two agents in two different rodent species and then applied toward better understanding of the mechanisms involved in their protective actions. In liver microsomes of treated mice, both BHA and BHT enhanced the relative activity of aniline ring hydroxylation but decreased the relative benzo(a)pyrene monooxidase activities. However, in rats, although aniline ring hydroxylation activity was decreased by both compounds, the decrease of benzo(a)pyrene monooxidase activity was observed only with BHT. Thus, common effects could not be recognized at the microsomal mixed-function oxidase level. Contrary to expectations based on chemical structures, BHT feeding elevated by epoxide hydrolase activity to an even greater extent than that produced by BHA, especially in rats. However, enzyme activities involved in the glucuronide conjugation system (uridine diphosphate:glucuronyl transferase, uridine diphosphate:glucose dehydrogenase, and quinone reductase) are all elevated by both antioxidants in both rodent species. With BHA treatment, the levels of acid-soluble thiols were increased in both rats and mice. However, with BHT, the level was increased only in mice but not in rats. Similar trends were produced for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity, but glutathione reductase activity was increased even for BHT-treated rats. Additionally, the glutathione S-transferase activities were also increased by both antioxidant treatments and in both rodent species. Based on these results, the elevations of epoxide hydrolase activity along with the enhanced glucuronide conjugation and glutathione oxidation and reduction conjugation system enzyme activities were common to both compounds in both rodent species. This suggests their involvement in anticarcinogenic mechanisms. Increases of these detoxification enzyme activities appeared to be all designed to accelerate the elimination of administered antioxidants but, inadvertantly, conferring protective effects from xenobiotics such as carcinogens.