Orta-Sibu N, Chantler C, Bewick M, Haycock G
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Jul 24;285(6337):258-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6337.258.
Two corticosteroid regimens were compared in a randomised, prospective study of 48 consecutive acute rejection episodes occurring at least one month after transplantation in 22 children who had received renal allografts. The higher dose schedule (intravenous methylprednisolone 600 mg/m2 daily for three days) was no more effective than the lower (oral prednisolone 3 mg/kg daily for three days) in reversing rejection, being successful in 70% as opposed to 72% of episodes. Few major side effects were seen with either treatment, but unpleasant sensations were reported much more frequently in the group given intravenous methylprednisolone; this regimen was much more disruptive of the patient's life. Oral prednisolone in the dosage described is as effective as about 10 times that dose of intravenous methylprednisolone; it is much cheaper and is viewed as less unpleasant by patients.
在一项随机、前瞻性研究中,对22名接受同种异体肾移植的儿童在移植后至少1个月发生的48次连续急性排斥反应进行了两种皮质类固醇治疗方案的比较。高剂量方案(静脉注射甲泼尼龙600mg/m²,每日3天)在逆转排斥反应方面并不比低剂量方案(口服泼尼松龙3mg/kg,每日3天)更有效,高剂量方案成功逆转70%的排斥反应,低剂量方案为72%。两种治疗均未见严重副作用,但静脉注射甲泼尼龙组报告的不适感更频繁;该方案对患者生活的干扰更大。所述剂量的口服泼尼松龙与约10倍剂量的静脉注射甲泼尼龙效果相同;它更便宜,患者认为其不适感更小。