Friesen M D, Garren L
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1982 Jul;65(4):855-63.
Three aflatoxin-contaminated samples (raw peanut meal, deoiled peanut meal, and yellow corn meal) were analyzed by 121 laboratories in 31 countries. Sufficient data were obtained to permit a statistical comparison of the performance of laboratories using the BF, CB, and EEC methods and those using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for quantitation. No significant differences were found between means for laboratories using these 4 methods for the analysis of raw peanut meal or yellow corn meal. However, for deoiled peanut meal, means were significantly different for laboratories using the BF method compared with the CB or EEC methods for B1 and B2, and for laboratories using the CB method compared with HPLC methods for G2.
来自31个国家的121个实验室对三份受黄曲霉毒素污染的样品(生花生粕、脱油花生粕和黄玉米粉)进行了分析。获得了足够的数据,以便对使用比色法(BF)、柱后衍生法(CB)和欧共体方法以及使用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)进行定量分析的实验室的性能进行统计比较。对于生花生粕或黄玉米粉的分析,使用这四种方法的实验室的平均值之间没有显著差异。然而,对于脱油花生粕,使用BF法的实验室与使用CB法或欧共体方法分析B1和B2的实验室的平均值有显著差异,对于使用CB法的实验室与使用HPLC法分析G2的实验室的平均值有显著差异。