Suppr超能文献

癫痫的对照试验:综述

Controlled trials in epilepsy: a review.

作者信息

Gram L, Bentsen K D, Parnas J, Flachs H

出版信息

Epilepsia. 1982 Oct;23(5):491-519. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1982.tb05437.x.

Abstract

A comprehensive review, evaluating 51 randomized double-blind controlled studies, covering different aspects of epileptology, is presented. Trials were grouped according to the investigated topic and for each group an attempt was made to derive an overall conclusion. The majority of studies investigated antiepileptic drug treatments. Other topics were: psychotropic effect of antiepileptic drugs, folic acid and vitamin D administration in epilepsy, and EEG investigations. A cross-sectional analysis of items such as designs, patient sampling principles, recording of effect parameters and side effects, concomitant treatments, and statistical evaluations demonstrated that cross-over designs, investigating fixed dosage schedules, were extensively used. Less than half of these studies included a washout period between treatments, complicating the interpretation of the obtained results. The vast majority of studies involved only chronic patients; and marked heterogeneity in patient selection with respect to age, seizure type, and mental status, and severity of epilepsy was observed. Classifications of seizures varied between the studies. The most prominent effect parameter was seizure frequency. The use of heterogeneous patient samples frequently necessitated equalization of widely different seizure types in order to perform statistical analyses. The mean duration of trials was 6 months, precluding evaluation of chronic toxicity. The majority of studies recorded side effects, but data collection was rather unsystematic and statistical evaluation was seldom applied. Most studies were add-on trials, and since concomitant treatment was frequently changed during the investigations, it was difficult to evaluate the influence of this variable. A correlation analysis across trials demonstrated, among other things, that the common assumption that short controlled trials provide too optimistic results, could not be substantiated. This survey provides no firm indication of which drug is more suitable for which seizure type.

摘要

本文呈现了一项全面综述,评估了51项随机双盲对照研究,这些研究涵盖了癫痫学的不同方面。试验根据研究主题进行分组,并试图为每组得出总体结论。大多数研究调查了抗癫痫药物治疗。其他主题包括:抗癫痫药物的精神效应、癫痫患者的叶酸和维生素D给药以及脑电图检查。对设计、患者抽样原则、疗效参数和副作用记录、伴随治疗以及统计评估等项目的横断面分析表明,采用交叉设计来研究固定剂量方案的情况广泛存在。这些研究中不到一半在治疗之间设置了洗脱期,这使得对所得结果的解释变得复杂。绝大多数研究仅涉及慢性患者;并且在患者选择方面,观察到在年龄、癫痫发作类型、精神状态以及癫痫严重程度上存在明显的异质性。各研究之间癫痫发作的分类也有所不同。最突出的疗效参数是癫痫发作频率。使用异质性患者样本常常需要对差异很大的癫痫发作类型进行均衡处理,以便进行统计分析。试验的平均持续时间为6个月,这排除了对慢性毒性的评估。大多数研究记录了副作用,但数据收集相当不系统,很少应用统计评估。大多数研究是附加试验,并且由于在研究过程中伴随治疗经常改变,因此难以评估该变量的影响。跨试验的相关性分析表明,除其他外,那种认为短期对照试验结果过于乐观的普遍假设无法得到证实。这项调查没有明确表明哪种药物更适合哪种癫痫发作类型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验