Suppr超能文献

新生霉素和阿非迪霉素对DNA修复抑制作用的特异性和完整性

Specificity and completeness of inhibition of DNA repair by novobiocin and aphidicolin.

作者信息

Cleaver J E

出版信息

Carcinogenesis. 1982;3(10):1171-4. doi: 10.1093/carcin/3.10.1171.

Abstract

Novobiocin and aphidicolin were both potent inhibitors of excision repair of u.v.-induced damage to DNA in human embryonic fibroblasts, and both also inhibited semiconservative DNA replication even more strongly. The mechanism of action of these two drugs is, however, different. Novobiocin inhibited repair replication without accumulating single-strand breaks, but aphidicolin inhibited repair replication with the accumulation of numerous single-strand breaks. Novobiocin appears to inhibit repair at an earlier stage than aphidicolin, which may indicate that DNA topoisomerases play a role in eukaryotic DNA repair. Digestion of DNA by exonuclease III indicated that repair patches in novobiocin-treated cells contained no excess 3'OH termini, whereas up to 40% of the repaired DNA in aphidicolin-treated cells had free 3'OH termini. Therefore, although aphidicolin resulted in the accumulation of single-strand breaks, many of the repair events escaped inhibition and the number of breaks is an underestimate of the true number of repair events.

摘要

新生霉素和阿非迪霉素都是人胚成纤维细胞中紫外线诱导的DNA损伤切除修复的有效抑制剂,并且二者对DNA半保留复制的抑制作用更强。然而,这两种药物的作用机制不同。新生霉素抑制修复复制,却不积累单链断裂,但阿非迪霉素抑制修复复制时会积累大量单链断裂。新生霉素似乎比阿非迪霉素在更早阶段抑制修复,这可能表明DNA拓扑异构酶在真核生物DNA修复中发挥作用。核酸外切酶III对DNA的消化表明,用新生霉素处理的细胞中的修复片段不含有过量的3'OH末端,而用阿非迪霉素处理的细胞中高达40%的修复DNA具有游离的3'OH末端。因此,尽管阿非迪霉素导致单链断裂的积累,但许多修复事件未受抑制,并且断裂的数量低估了真正的修复事件数量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验