Mollica R F
N Engl J Med. 1983 Feb 17;308(7):367-73. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198302173080705.
Before 1950, publicly supported psychiatric services (i.e., those of so-called public psychiatry) were provided primarily at state hospitals. Over the past 30 years public psychiatry has shifted its emphasis away from long-term custodial care to outpatient and community-based services. Paradoxically, this broadening of focus has become associated with both an expanded use of psychiatric services and a threatened decline in clinical standards and treatment goals. Five areas of policy confusion and contradiction threaten the stability of public mental-health services: the shift in emphasis from public to private services, the issue of rehabilitation and reintegration into society versus custodial care, the differential treatment of the lower-class patient, the demedicalization of public services, and conflict between professionals and blurring of roles within the psychiatric profession. These problems reflect public psychiatry's overemphasis on social reform and political rather than clinical definitions of treatment, its lack of specific treatment and of defined treatment goals, and its inability to change psychiatry's (and society's) historical assignment of low status to the public patient.
1950年以前,公共资助的精神科服务(即所谓的公共精神病学服务)主要在州立医院提供。在过去30年里,公共精神病学已将重点从长期监护护理转向门诊和社区服务。矛盾的是,这种关注点的拓宽既与精神科服务的使用增加有关,也与临床标准和治疗目标的下降威胁有关。政策上的五个混乱和矛盾领域威胁着公共心理健康服务的稳定性:重点从公共服务向私人服务的转变、康复和重新融入社会与监护护理的问题、对下层阶级患者的区别对待、公共服务的非医学化,以及专业人员之间的冲突和精神科专业内角色的模糊。这些问题反映了公共精神病学过度强调社会改革和政治而非临床治疗定义,缺乏具体治疗方法和明确的治疗目标,以及无力改变精神病学(和社会)对公共患者地位低下的历史定位。