Forster R
Institut für Soziologie der Universität Wien.
Psychiatr Prax. 2000 Sep;27 Suppl 2:S39-43.
The article summarizes in an international perspective what kind of results psychiatric deinstitutionalization has brought so far: a profound change of size and functions of the psychiatric hospital; better services for people with less severe problems; and the failing of community services to compensate for some of the functions of the former asylums, resulting in trans-institutionalization and/or neglect for many chronic patients. Three different sociological versions to explain the background and typical outcomes of psychiatric deinstitutionalization have been brought forward so far: political economy, professional dominance and post-structuralism. They are confronted with an approach using the concept of medicalisation which offers a more comprehensive understanding of the process.
精神病院规模和功能的深刻变化;为病情较轻者提供了更好的服务;以及社区服务未能弥补前收容所的部分功能,导致许多慢性病患者出现跨机构化和/或被忽视的情况。迄今为止,已经提出了三种不同的社会学观点来解释精神科去机构化的背景和典型结果:政治经济学、专业主导和后结构主义。它们与一种运用医学化概念的方法相对,这种方法能对这一过程提供更全面的理解。