Rhodewalt F, Davison J
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983 Jan;44(1):220-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.44.1.220.
An experiment is reported that explored the role of self-attributional differences as mediators of reactions to threats to control in Type A and Type B individuals. Both Type A and Type B subjects were placed in a choice elimination reactance paradigm. In addition to the standard control and choice elimination conditions, subjects were induced to attribute having a choice among evaluated items either to themselves or to the situation prior to experiencing the elimination of choice. Reactance was measured by the subjects' reevaluations of the eliminated choice alternative. Results indicated that when a behavioral freedom is blocked, without manipulating attributions, only Type As experienced reactance. When subjects were induced to attribute having a choice to themselves, the magnitude of the reactance responses increased for both Type As and Type Bs. In contrast, when Type As and Type Bs were induced to attribute having choice to the situation, neither group reacted to the loss of choice. These results are integrated with previous findings on the coronary-prone behavior pattern.
本文报告了一项实验,该实验探讨了自我归因差异在A型和B型个体对控制威胁反应中的中介作用。A型和B型受试者均被置于选择消除反抗范式中。除了标准的控制和选择消除条件外,在经历选择消除之前,受试者被诱导将在评估项目中进行选择的原因归因于自己或情境。反抗通过受试者对被消除的选择选项的重新评估来衡量。结果表明,当行为自由受到阻碍时,在不操纵归因的情况下,只有A型个体体验到反抗。当受试者被诱导将拥有选择归因于自己时,A型和B型个体的反抗反应程度均增加。相比之下,当A型和B型个体被诱导将拥有选择归因于情境时,两组对选择丧失均无反应。这些结果与先前关于易患冠心病行为模式的研究结果相结合。