Boening J
J Int Med Res. 1983;11(1):15-20. doi: 10.1177/030006058301100104.
Thirty patients diagnosed as suffering from endogenous depression were entered into a 3-week double-blind trial comparing three times a day dosage of dothiepin with a single night-time dosage in a dosage range of 75 mg to 225 mg per day. The trial was conducted on in-patients and assessments were made pretrial and after 1 and 3 weeks. The patients were assessed by clinician-rated scales for psychomotor and psychic symptoms and by Zung's self-rating scale. Fifteen patients received dothiepin three times a day (day-time group) and fifteen received it as a single night-time dose (nocte group). There were two withdrawals in the day-time group and three in the nocte group. All withdrawals were due to lack of therapeutic effect. Over the 3-week trial 67% of the day-time group and 47% of the nocte group showed a clinical improvement. It was found that there was no statistically significant difference between the two methods of treatment. In the day-time group seven patients and in the night-time group nine patients suffered from side-effects. No particular pattern of side-effects emerged. There were no drug-related changes in the laboratory results. It was concluded that the therapeutic effect of both dosage regimes should be regarded as equivalent. Advantages, due to the specific action of dothiepin, compared with classical antidepressants for reference, could, however, not be presumed by the clinical impression.
30名被诊断患有内源性抑郁症的患者参与了一项为期3周的双盲试验,该试验比较了多塞平每日三次给药与每晚一次给药(剂量范围为每日75毫克至225毫克)的效果。试验在住院患者中进行,在试验前以及1周和3周后进行评估。通过临床医生评定的精神运动和精神症状量表以及zung自评量表对患者进行评估。15名患者每日三次服用多塞平(日间组),15名患者每晚服用一次(夜间组)。日间组有2名患者退出试验,夜间组有3名患者退出试验。所有退出均因缺乏治疗效果。在为期3周的试验中,日间组67%的患者和夜间组47%的患者临床症状有所改善。结果发现,两种治疗方法之间没有统计学上的显著差异。日间组有7名患者、夜间组有9名患者出现副作用。未出现特定的副作用模式。实验室检查结果未出现与药物相关的变化。结论是,两种给药方案的治疗效果应被视为等效。然而,根据临床印象,无法推断出与经典抗抑郁药相比,多塞平因其特定作用而具有的优势。