McAfee P C, Yuan H A, Fredrickson B E, Lubicky J P
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983 Apr;65(4):461-73.
We studied 100 consecutive patients with potentially unstable fractures and fracture-dislocations by multiplane computed tomography. The mechanism of failure of the middle osteoligamentous complex of the spine (posterior longitudinal ligament, posterior part of the vertebral body, and posterior annulus fibrosus) was determined by three-dimensional analysis. Three modes of middle-column failure were used to classify the injuries: axial compression (seventy-three patients), axial distraction (fifteen patients), and translation within the transverse plane (twelve patients). Fifty of eighty-six patients who were evaluated in the acute phase of injury underwent operative stabilization, and the mechanism of middle-column disruption determined the type of instrumentation that was used. Compression and distraction injuries of the middle complex could be appropriately treated by Harrington distraction and compression instrumentation, respectively. However, in translational injuries (torn posterior longitudinal ligament) routine Harrington instrumentation was contraindicated due to the risk of overdistraction. Translational injuries were associated with the greatest degree of instability and often had complete ligament discontinuity at the level of the affected vertebrae. Patients with a translational injury had the most severe neural deficits (six of eleven patients studied acutely having a complete spinal cord lesion). Translational injuries of the middle column were treated by segmental spinal instrumentation to provide strong fixation with minimum risk of neural sequelae from passing sublaminar wires. Moreover, postoperative use of a cast over insensate skin was not required. Computed tomography was more sensitive than any other modality in the diagnosis of disruption of the posterior elements in unstable burst fractures, and computer-reconstructed sagittal images were accurate in evaluating the nature of facet-joint failure in distraction injuries. Computed tomography with metrizamide proved superior to either conventional tomography or myelography alone in localizing the site of neural canal compromise in acute thoracolumbar injuries. The mode of failure of the middle osteoligamentous complex as visualized by computed tomography determined the pattern of spinal injury, the severity of the neural deficit, the degree of instability, and the type of instrumentation required.
我们通过多平面计算机断层扫描研究了100例连续的具有潜在不稳定骨折和骨折脱位的患者。通过三维分析确定脊柱中骨韧带复合体(后纵韧带、椎体后部和纤维环后部)的失效机制。中柱失效的三种模式用于对损伤进行分类:轴向压缩(73例患者)、轴向牵张(15例患者)和横向平面内平移(12例患者)。86例在损伤急性期接受评估的患者中有50例接受了手术稳定治疗,中柱破坏的机制决定了所使用的内固定类型。中复合体的压缩和牵张损伤可分别通过哈林顿牵张和压缩内固定进行适当治疗。然而,在平移损伤(后纵韧带撕裂)中,由于存在过度牵张的风险,常规哈林顿内固定是禁忌的。平移损伤与最大程度的不稳定相关,并且在受影响椎体水平通常存在韧带完全中断。平移损伤患者的神经功能缺损最严重(11例急性研究患者中有6例存在完全性脊髓损伤)。中柱的平移损伤通过节段性脊柱内固定进行治疗,以提供牢固固定,同时将穿过椎板下钢丝导致神经后遗症的风险降至最低。此外,术后不需要在感觉丧失的皮肤上使用石膏。计算机断层扫描在诊断不稳定爆裂骨折中后部结构破坏方面比任何其他方式都更敏感,计算机重建的矢状面图像在评估牵张损伤中关节突关节失效的性质方面是准确的。经证实,使用甲泛葡胺的计算机断层扫描在定位急性胸腰段损伤中神经根管受压部位方面优于单独的传统断层扫描或脊髓造影。计算机断层扫描所显示的中骨韧带复合体的失效模式决定了脊柱损伤的类型、神经功能缺损的严重程度、不稳定程度以及所需的内固定类型。