Wilcox R G, Mitchell J R
Lancet. 1977 Jun 11;1(8024):1247-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)92452-7.
A retrospective analysis of the frequency of requests for an intravenous urogram (I.V.P.) in men with acute retention of urine showed that this investigation was performed in 82%. In no instance, however, did the urographic findings influence the decision to operate or the type of operation performed. The introduction of a specialised urological service did not reduce the number of I.V.P.s requested because most referrals to the urologist were made after the I.V.P. Patients who had an I.V.P. waited on average 8 days from admission to operation compared with 3-5 days for those who did not. We conclude that no purpose is served by a routine I.V.P. in every male patient admitted to hospital with acute retention of urine.
对因急性尿潴留入院的男性患者进行静脉尿路造影(I.V.P.)检查请求频率的回顾性分析显示,82%的患者接受了该项检查。然而,尿路造影结果在任何情况下都未影响手术决策或所实施的手术类型。专门的泌尿外科服务的引入并未减少静脉尿路造影检查的请求数量,因为大多数转诊至泌尿外科医生处的患者是在静脉尿路造影检查之后。接受静脉尿路造影检查的患者从入院到手术平均等待8天,而未接受该项检查的患者等待时间为3 - 5天。我们得出结论,对于因急性尿潴留入院的每位男性患者常规进行静脉尿路造影检查并无意义。