Gabelman C G, Gann D S, Ashworth C J, Carney W I
Am J Surg. 1983 Apr;145(4):477-82. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(83)90043-0.
One hundred consecutive patients who underwent carotid reconstructions were divided into two groups by anesthesia type (general 46, local 54) and retrospectively reviewed. Particular interest was paid to length of hospital stay and billing data. There were no differences in presenting symptoms, risk factors, incidence of stroke, cranial nerve injury, or wound hematoma. Significant reductions in length of operating time, intensive care unit time, and postoperative stay and intraluminal shunt usage were demonstrated. Calculated billings and actual billings were reviewed and found to be markedly diminished in the local anesthesia group.
连续100例接受颈动脉重建术的患者按麻醉类型分为两组(全身麻醉46例,局部麻醉54例),并进行回顾性分析。特别关注住院时间和计费数据。两组在症状表现、危险因素、中风发生率、颅神经损伤或伤口血肿方面无差异。结果显示,局部麻醉组的手术时间、重症监护病房停留时间、术后住院时间和腔内分流器使用次数均显著减少。对计算账单和实际账单进行审查后发现,局部麻醉组的费用明显降低。