Sprenger E, Hilgarth M, Vogt-Schaden M
Pathol Res Pract. 1978 Jul;162(3):263-8. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(78)80042-9.
Flow-through cytophotometric determination of nuclear DNA content on jet wash material from the endometrium was employed in the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. One hundred and thirty cases were studied. In comparison to results from cytodiagnosis, flow-through photometry yielded a false negative rate of 31.6% and a false positive rate of 42.2%. The false negative findings resulted in part from the small relative frequency of atypical cells in a mixed population of normal and atypical cells in certain cases. Besides this, we often found carcinomas with a diploid DNA stem line, which could not be distinguished cytophotometrically from normal corpus endometrium (Sandritter, 1952; Atkin et al., 1959; Hustin, 1976). The flow-through photometrically false positive findings may have resulted either from cell aggregates or from a nuclear DNA content elevated over the diploid value in proliferating cells (D. Wagner et al., 1968; D. Wagner and Richard, 1968). The observed false negative and false positive rates demonstrate that flow-through photometric determination of nuclear DNA content is unsuitable for the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma.
采用流式细胞光度法测定子宫内膜冲洗液中的核DNA含量,用于子宫内膜癌的诊断。共研究了130例病例。与细胞诊断结果相比,流式光度法的假阴性率为31.6%,假阳性率为42.2%。假阴性结果部分是由于在某些病例中,正常细胞和非典型细胞混合群体中非典型细胞的相对频率较低。除此之外,我们经常发现具有二倍体DNA干系的癌,在细胞光度法上无法与正常子宫内膜区分开来(桑德里特,1952年;阿特金等人,1959年;胡斯汀,1976年)。流式光度法的假阳性结果可能是由于细胞聚集或增殖细胞中核DNA含量超过二倍体值所致(D. 瓦格纳等人,1968年;D. 瓦格纳和理查德,1968年)。观察到的假阴性和假阳性率表明,流式光度法测定核DNA含量不适用于子宫内膜癌的诊断。