de Sauvage R C, Cazals Y, Erre J P, Aran J M
J Acoust Soc Am. 1983 Feb;73(2):616-27. doi: 10.1121/1.388872.
An experimental study of the electrical stimulation of the guinea pig cochlea is made using an electrode on the round window for both stimulation and recording. The neural response is separated from the electrical artifact with a masking procedure combined with a low amplification, "statistical" averaging method [Charlet de Sauvage et al., Hear. Res. 2, 343-346 (1980)]. The high electrical impedance required for recording physiological responses implies the use of a current pulse generator. Monitoring of evoked potentials from the auditory cortex provides evidence that the effects of electrical stimulation (and of masking noise) are of auditory origin. The electrically evoked round window response is of very short latency (less than 0.2 ms). There is a response threshold for both electrical stimulus and masking noise. The response amplitude varies monotonically as a function of masking noise or electrical stimulus intensity. Experiments with high-pass noise masking suggest that the electrical stimulus is mainly acting on basal fibers. The response latency and waveform are independent of electrical stimulus intensity, repetition rate, masker level, or spectrum. Little intersubject variation is noted. Our experiments (reciprocal forward masking by electrical and acoustic stimuli) suggest that a direct, instantaneous electrical stimulation of the fibers occurs. We believe that this response to electrical stimulation represents the mean unit response of the auditory nerve fibers. This approach may be useful in the separate study of cochlear and VIIIth nerve functions and in the analysis (deconvolution) of the acoustically evoked compound AP.
利用置于圆窗上的电极进行刺激和记录,对豚鼠耳蜗的电刺激进行了一项实验研究。通过结合低放大倍数的“统计”平均方法的掩蔽程序,将神经反应与电伪迹分离[沙莱·德·索瓦热等人,《听觉研究》2,343 - 346(1980)]。记录生理反应所需的高电阻抗意味着要使用电流脉冲发生器。对听觉皮层诱发电位的监测提供了证据,表明电刺激(以及掩蔽噪声)的效应源自听觉。电诱发的圆窗反应潜伏期非常短(小于0.2毫秒)。电刺激和掩蔽噪声都存在反应阈值。反应幅度随掩蔽噪声或电刺激强度单调变化。高通噪声掩蔽实验表明,电刺激主要作用于基底纤维。反应潜伏期和波形与电刺激强度、重复率、掩蔽声水平或频谱无关。个体间差异很小。我们的实验(电刺激和声刺激的相互前向掩蔽)表明,纤维发生了直接、即时的电刺激。我们认为这种对电刺激的反应代表了听神经纤维的平均单位反应。这种方法可能有助于分别研究耳蜗和第八对脑神经的功能,以及对声诱发复合动作电位进行分析(去卷积)。