Abrams R, Taylor M A
Am J Psychiatry. 1983 Feb;140(2):171-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.140.2.171.
The authors present two reasons for reassessing familial transmission of schizophrenia: recent major changes in diagnostic criteria and methodological weaknesses of older studies. Their own study of this subject employed narrowly defined, operational research criteria; prospective proband selection; semistructured family interviews; and blind, independent diagnoses of probands and relatives. For 30 schizophrenic probands they found an age-corrected morbidity risk in first-degree relatives of 1.61%, a figure that would only support familial transmission if the true population prevalence of schizophrenia were .2% or less. The authors conclude that the case for familial transmission of narrowly defined schizophrenia is weak and suggest alternative hypotheses.
近期诊断标准的重大变化以及早期研究的方法学缺陷。他们自己对该主题的研究采用了狭义定义的操作性研究标准;前瞻性先证者选择;半结构化家庭访谈;以及对先证者和亲属进行盲法、独立诊断。对于30名精神分裂症先证者,他们发现一级亲属的年龄校正发病风险为1.61%,只有当精神分裂症的真实人群患病率为0.2%或更低时,这一数字才支持家族遗传。作者得出结论,狭义定义的精神分裂症家族遗传的证据不足,并提出了其他假设。