Johannsen A
Acta Orthop Scand. 1978 Jun;49(3):295-301. doi: 10.3109/17453677809005768.
In a prospective study of 244 patients with ankle lesions a comparison between the talar tilt and the anterior drawer sign was made, leading to the following conclusions: Ligament lesions which are not disclosed by the talar tilt examination may be diagnosed by the anterior drawer sign. The anterior drawer sign cannot replace the talar tilt examination, or vice versa. The two methods are complementary. It is not possible to differentiate between an isolated lesion of the anterior talofibular ligament and a combined lesion of the anterior talofibular and the calcaneofibular ligaments by the two methods.
在一项对244例踝关节损伤患者的前瞻性研究中，对距骨倾斜试验和前抽屉试验进行了比较，得出以下结论：距骨倾斜试验未发现的韧带损伤可能通过前抽屉试验诊断出来。前抽屉试验不能替代距骨倾斜试验，反之亦然。这两种方法是互补的。通过这两种方法无法区分单纯的距腓前韧带损伤和距腓前韧带与跟腓韧带联合损伤。
