• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估自付费用对计划生育服务的影响:加利福尼亚州的初步分析

Assessing the impact of copayment on family planning services: a preliminary analysis in California.

作者信息

Aved B M, Harp V

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1983 Jul;73(7):763-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.7.763.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.73.7.763
PMID:6859359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1650897/
Abstract

A legislatively mandated copayment system for California state-funded family planning services was evaluated after the first six months of experience. Most clients reportedly could make their payments, but three times as many providers suggested lowering the fees as suggested raising them, and one-third reported a decrease in client donations. While the majority of providers did not report a decrease in clients, 22 per cent did so. For these drop-outs, it is estimated that the State would pay approximately $3 million in costs associated with unintended pregnancies, or one and a half times the amount cut from the Family Planning budget.

摘要

在经历了头六个月之后,对加利福尼亚州政府资助的计划生育服务法定自付费用系统进行了评估。据报道,大多数客户能够支付费用,但建议降低费用的提供者数量是建议提高费用者的三倍,三分之一的提供者报告客户捐赠减少。虽然大多数提供者没有报告客户减少,但有22%的提供者这样做了。对于这些退出的客户,估计该州将支付约300万美元与意外怀孕相关的费用,这是从计划生育预算中削减金额的1.5倍。

相似文献

1
Assessing the impact of copayment on family planning services: a preliminary analysis in California.评估自付费用对计划生育服务的影响:加利福尼亚州的初步分析
Am J Public Health. 1983 Jul;73(7):763-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.7.763.
2
Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.公共资助的避孕服务对意外怀孕的影响及其对医疗补助支出的意义。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Sep-Oct;28(5):188-95.
3
A benefit-cost analysis of family planning services in Iowa.爱荷华州计划生育服务的效益成本分析。
Eval Health Prof. 1988 Dec;11(4):403-24. doi: 10.1177/016327878801100401.
4
The effect of user fees on the utilization of family planning services. A clinical study.使用者付费对计划生育服务利用情况的影响。一项临床研究。
West Indian Med J. 1994 Jun;43(2):43-5.
5
A cost analysis of family planning in Bangladesh.孟加拉国计划生育的成本分析。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1997 Oct-Dec;12(4):251-77. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199710/12)12:4<251::AID-HPM489>3.0.CO;2-1.
6
The impact of public-sector expenditures for contraceptive services in California.加利福尼亚州公共部门在避孕服务方面的支出影响。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1990 Jul-Aug;22(4):161-8.
7
Public savings from the prevention of unintended pregnancy: a cost analysis of family planning services in California.预防意外怀孕带来的公共储蓄:加利福尼亚州计划生育服务的成本分析。
Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;42(5):1960-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00702.x.
8
Family planning clinic services in the United States, 1994.1994年美国的计划生育诊所服务
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 May-Jun;28(3):92-100.
9
Paying for family planning.支付计划生育费用。
Popul Rep J. 1991 Nov(39):1-31.
10
Impact of sustainability policies on sterilization services in Latin America.可持续发展政策对拉丁美洲绝育服务的影响。
Stud Fam Plann. 1992 Mar-Apr;23(2):85-96.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilization of child health clinics following introduction of a copayment.引入自付费用后儿童健康诊所的利用情况
Am J Public Health. 1984 Dec;74(12):1401-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.12.1401.
2
Patterns of contraceptive method of use by California family planning clinic clients, 1976-84.1976 - 1984年加利福尼亚计划生育诊所客户的避孕方法使用模式
Am J Public Health. 1985 Oct;75(10):1210-2. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.10.1210.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of family planning programs on unplanned pregnancies.计划生育项目对意外怀孕的影响。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1977 Jul-Aug;9(4):173-6.